VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs VW Grand California – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Skoda Kodiaq or VW Grand California fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the VW Grand California costs 70200 £. That’s a price difference of around 33388 £.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a evident edge – offering 265 HP compared to 163 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Skoda Kodiaq offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, the Skoda Kodiaq is convincingly lighter – 1684 kg compared to 3052 kg. The difference is around 1368 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more room – 910 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 910 L.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq a bit takes the win – 545 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.

Our conclusion: The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be dominates this comparison and thus becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Overall, Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the competitive SUV landscape, the Skoda Kodiaq and Dacia Bigster offer distinct advantages for buyers seeking practicality and value. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, making it a top choice for families. In contrast, the Bigster appeals to budget-conscious consumers with its robust design and functionality, proving that affordability doesn't have to compromise style or capability.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive SUV segment, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its spacious interior and family-friendly features, making it a top choice for those prioritizing comfort and practicality. On the other hand, the VW Tayron impresses with its stylish design and refined driving dynamics, appealing to those seeking a more premium experience. While both models share a common platform, their distinct personalities cater to different driver preferences, making this comparison essential for prospective buyers.

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

VW Grand California

The Grand California is Volkswagen's remarkable take on the camper van, blending practicality with comfort for the ultimate road trip experience. With ample space for both living and storage, it's designed for adventure seekers who don't want to compromise on amenities. Whether you're exploring coastal roads or setting up camp in the mountains, the Grand California offers a perfect home away from home.

details
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Grand California
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Price
70200 - 77900 £
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
9 - 186 g/km
co2
-
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
75 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Bus
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Curb weight
3052 - 3354 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
0 L
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Length
5986 - 6836 mm
Width
1864 mm
Width
2040 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Height
2839 - 2971 mm
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 545 kg
Payload
146 - 448 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
163 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
120 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1968 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
Brand
Skoda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLB and Skoda Kodiaq stand out for their unique blend of luxury and practicality. While the GLB boasts a premium interior and advanced technology features, the Kodiaq excels in space and functionality, making it a family-friendly choice. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preferences, whether it's the opulence of the GLB or the value and versatility of the Kodiaq.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of family-friendly SUVs, the all-electric Skoda Enyaq and the traditional combustion engine-powered Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct experiences to prospective buyers. The Enyaq impresses with its futuristic design and seamless electric driving, providing an environmentally friendly alternative that excels in efficiency and innovation. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands as a versatile choice with a robust engine lineup and spacious interior, delivering a reliable performance that caters to those who prioritize long-distance capability and a classic SUV feel.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 exudes Scandinavian luxury, offering cutting-edge safety features, premium interior materials, and a more refined driving experience, albeit at a higher price point.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of mid-size SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its impressive space and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and those needing extra cargo capacity. On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 boasts a luxurious interior and advanced safety features that focus on a premium driving experience. Ultimately, the decision between these two models will hinge on whether buyers prioritize functionality or sophisticated comfort.
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing to families who prioritize comfort and adaptability. Both models offer distinct strengths, making the choice between them a matter of individual lifestyle needs and preferences.
Renault Austral
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct advantages that cater to different driver needs. The Renault Austral stands out with its sleek design and cutting-edge technology, delivering an engaging drive with efficient hybrid options. Conversely, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and robust practicality, particularly appealing for families requiring ample cargo space and versatile seating.
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.