What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Kodiaq?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Kodiaq delivers up to 265 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kodiaq according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.40 L.

What is the Skoda Kodiaq’s maximum WLTP range?

According to WLTP, the Skoda Kodiaq can travel up to 123 km on a single charge.

How large is the Skoda Kodiaq’s battery?

The battery capacity is 19.70 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq reaches up to 231 km/h.

How big is the Skoda Kodiaq overall?

Length 4758 mm, width 1864 mm, height 1679 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kodiaq.

What drive types are available for the VW T-Cross?

The VW T-Cross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the VW T-Cross?

Depending on the version, the VW T-Cross delivers up to 150 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the VW T-Cross in liters per 100 km?

On average, the VW T-Cross consumes 5.40 L.

What is the top speed of the VW T-Cross?

Depending on the model, top speed is 200 km/h.

How big is the VW T-Cross overall?

The VW T-Cross measures 4127 mm long, 1784 mm wide and 1573 mm high.

Skoda Kodiaq vs VW T-Cross - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 15771 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 5 L per 100 km.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a significantly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs a bit better – reaching 231 km/h, while the VW T-Cross tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls distinct stronger with 400 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is evident lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 417 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 455 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – up to 2105 L, which is about 824 L more than the VW T-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq slightly takes the win – 563 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 83 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

CUPRA Terramar

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota RAV4

VS

If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …

Costs and Consumption
Price 36800 - 49600 £	Price 21100 - 31500 £
Consumption L/100km 0.4 - 8.2 L	Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 113 - 123 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 19.70 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 9 - 186 g/km	co2 124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 45 - 58 L	Fuel tank capacity 40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1684 - 1970 kg	Curb weight 1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity 745 - 910 L	Trunk capacity 455 L
Length 4758 - 4761 mm	Length 4127 mm
Width 1864 mm	Width 1784 mm
Height 1663 - 1683 mm	Height 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity 1945 - 2105 L	Max trunk capacity 1281 L
Payload 460 - 563 kg	Payload 463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 265 HP	Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.3 - 9.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed 205 - 231 km/h	Max Speed 180 - 200 km/h
Torque 250 - 400 Nm	Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 110 - 195 kW	Power kW 70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3