Compare performance (428 HP vs 530 HP), boot space and price (34700 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – smart #3 or BYD Sealion 7?
As the automotive world strides forward into the electric era, two prominent contenders emerge from the throng—smart #3 and the BYD Sealion 7. Both encapsulate the inherent potential of battery-powered SUVs, but their approach to electrification and innovation delivers varied experiences for prospective buyers. Let's delve into the technical aspects and breakthroughs these vehicles present.
Starting with the design, the smart #3 presents a compact and sleek silhouette. Stretching at 4400 mm in length, 1844 mm in width, and 1556 mm in height, it maintains an urban-friendly footprint, perfect for city dwellers. The BYD Sealion 7, however, veers towards a larger frame, measuring 4830 mm in length, 1925 mm in width, and 1620 mm in height, offering a more imposing figure that's sure to attract those desiring more road presence.
The smart #3 is distinctly agile, offering two power variants—272 HP for the rear-wheel drive and a whopping 428 HP for the all-wheel version. These choices result in brisk accelerations from 0-100 km/h in 5.8 and 3.7 seconds respectively. Meanwhile, the Sealion 7 comes with power offerings of 313 HP and 530 HP, capable of sprinting to 100 km/h in 6.7 and 4.5 seconds, aided by its substantial torque delivery of up to 690 Nm.
Range anxiety is swept aside by the commendable distances these SUVs can cover on a full charge. The smart #3 can traverse between 325 km to 455 km depending on the variant, thanks to a choice between 47 kWh and 62 kWh battery capacities. In turn, the Sealion 7 surpasses this with ranges stretching from 456 km up to an impressive 502 km, albeit with slightly higher energy consumption of up to 21.9 kWh/100 km.
Inside, the smart #3 seats five, offering a trunk capacity of 370 liters, catering well to daily urban needs. The Sealion 7 enhances its utility factor with a more generous 520 liters of trunk space, which complements its larger exterior size and is ideal for those needing to haul more gear.
Both vehicles shine in their offerings of state-of-the-art technology. The smart #3 benefits from the brand's expertise in urban mobility, delivering a nimble and efficient city cruiser. On the other hand, BYD's Sealion 7 capitalizes on cutting-edge battery technology and a sophisticated all-wheel drive system for enhanced performance and safety on various terrains.
In the contest between smart #3 and BYD Sealion 7, discerning buyers will find key differences. The compact smart #3 suits the urbanite seeking performance with a slimmer profile, while the robust Sealion 7 appeals to those prioritizing range and utility. Both models, however, illustrate a promising future of eco-friendly motoring, shedding light on the diverse directions in which electric SUVs are heading.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
smart #3 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34700 £ , while the BYD Sealion 7 costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8143 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the smart #3: with 16.30 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the BYD Sealion 7 with 19.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the BYD Sealion 7 performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 502 km, about 47 km more than the smart #3.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Sealion 7 has a to a small extent edge – offering 530 HP compared to 428 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the BYD Sealion 7 takes 4.50 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Sealion 7 pulls to a small extent stronger with 690 Nm compared to 584 Nm. That’s about 106 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, smart #3 is distinct lighter – 1780 kg compared to 2225 kg. The difference is around 445 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BYD Sealion 7 offers distinct more room – 520 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 150 L.
When it comes to payload, smart #3 hardly perceptible takes the win – 450 kg compared to 410 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
The smart #3 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
The Sealion 7 captivates with its striking design and impressive performance that appeals to both enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. With a focus on comfort and advanced technology, this model redefines the driving experience, making every journey enjoyable. Its sleek silhouette coupled with an innovative interior showcases the perfect blend of style and functionality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34700 - 45800 £
|
Price
42800 - 52300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.9 - 21.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
325 - 455 km
|
Electric Range
456 - 502 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1780 - 1910 kg
|
Curb weight
2225 - 2435 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
|
Length
4400 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1844 mm
|
Width
1925 mm
|
|
Height
1556 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1160 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
419 - 450 kg
|
Payload
410 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
Power HP
313 - 530 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 690 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
Power kW
230 - 390 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
smart
|
Brand
BYD
|
The smart #3 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España