@ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
@ Volvo Cars
VS

SsangYong Rexton vs Volvo XC60 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (202 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (41100 £ vs 49200 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or Volvo XC60?

SsangYong Rexton

Volvo XC60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

SsangYong Rexton has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41100 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 8057 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.20 L. The difference is about 5.40 L per 100 km.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a decisively edge – offering 455 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 253 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.60 s. That’s about 5.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the SsangYong Rexton performs slight better – reaching 184 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls evident stronger with 709 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 268 Nm difference.

Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is to a small extent lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2145 kg. The difference is around 245 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers distinct more room – 784 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 301 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Rexton performs distinct better – up to 1977 L, which is about 434 L more than the Volvo XC60.

When it comes to payload, SsangYong Rexton clearly perceptible takes the win – 770 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 220 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Volvo XC60 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo XC60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £49,200
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details
SsangYong Rexton
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Volvo XC60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior @ Volvo Cars
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior @ Volvo Cars

Reviews SsangYong Rexton

Reviews Volvo XC60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC60 and VW Tiguan stand out with their unique offerings. The XC60 boasts cutting-edge safety features and a luxurious interior, making it a favorite for those prioritizing comfort and security. Meanwhile, the Tiguan impresses with its spaciousness …
SsangYong Rexton
Volvo XC60
Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
41100 - 51300 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
8.20 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
214 - 216 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2145 - 2180 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4850 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1960 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1825 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1806 - 1977 L
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
655 - 770 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.60 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
184 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
441 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
148 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2157 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2021 - 2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of mid-size SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its impressive space and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and those needing extra cargo capacity. On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 boasts a luxurious interior and advanced safety features that focus on a premium …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the head-to-head comparison of the Volvo XC60 and Lynk & Co 08, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table. The Volvo XC60 stands out with its time-tested reputation for safety and luxury, offering a refined driving experience and robust build quality. On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 08, …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle between the Kia Sportage and the Volvo XC60, both SUVs offer distinct advantages that cater to different priorities. The Kia Sportage impresses with its value for money, offering a vibrant design and a suite of standard features that appeal to the budget-conscious driver. Conversely, …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLB
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact luxury SUV segment, the Mercedes GLB stands out with its versatile seating layout and a seamless blend of style and functionality. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 impresses with its emphasis on safety and Scandinavian design aesthetics, offering a serene and high-tech driving …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
Is the SsangYong Rexton offered with different drivetrains?

The SsangYong Rexton is available as All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.