VS

SsangYong Rexton vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (202 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (41100 £ vs 49200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or Volvo XC60?

SsangYong Rexton vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • distinct more trunk space

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • decisively more power
  • decisively more efficient
  • convincingly quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • to a small extent lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rexton

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

SsangYong Rexton has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41100 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8057 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC60 manages with 2.80 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.20 L. The difference is about 5.40 L per 100 km.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a decisively edge – offering 455 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 253 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.60 s. That’s about 5.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the SsangYong Rexton performs slight better – reaching 184 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls evident stronger with 709 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 268 Nm difference.

Rexton

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Volvo XC60 is to a small extent lighter – 1900 kg compared to 2145 kg. The difference is around 245 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers distinct more room – 784 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 301 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Rexton performs distinct better – up to 1977 L, which is about 434 L more than the Volvo XC60.

When it comes to payload, SsangYong Rexton clearly perceptible takes the win – 770 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 220 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
SsangYong Rexton
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi

Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Frank Williams CPA/ ACCA/ CPD
22 Jan 2026, 01:20:01

Ssang Yong Rexton is better than the Land Cruiser

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
SsangYong Rexton
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
41100 - 51300 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
8.20 L
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
214 - 216 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2145 - 2180 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4850 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1960 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1825 mm
Height
1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1806 - 1977 L
Max trunk capacity
1543 L
Payload
655 - 770 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.60 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
184 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
441 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
148 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2157 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2021 - 2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Volvo XC60
Land Rover Discovery Sport
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo XC60 or the Land Rover Discovery Sport is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
BMW X1
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the BMW X1 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct offerings. The X1 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging driving dynamics, while the XC60 captivates with its elegant design and emphasis on safety features. Ultimately, the choice between …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the compact SUV arena, the Skoda Karoq and Volvo XC60 present distinct yet appealing offerings. The Karoq stands out with its practicality and value-driven features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the XC60, with its premium materials and advanced …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
Is the SsangYong Rexton offered with different drivetrains?

The SsangYong Rexton is available as All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.