Is the SsangYong Rexton offered with different drivetrains?

The SsangYong Rexton is available as All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the SsangYong Rexton deliver on the road?

Up to 202 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the SsangYong Rexton use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 8.20 L.

How fast can the SsangYong Rexton go?

The SsangYong Rexton reaches up to 184 km/h.

What are the SsangYong Rexton’s length, width and height?

Overall, the SsangYong Rexton is 4850 mm long, 1960 mm wide and 1825 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Volvo XC90 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo XC90's engine?

Up to 455 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Volvo XC90 use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 3.50 L.

How far can the Volvo XC90 go on a full charge?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 71 km.

What is the battery capacity of the Volvo XC90?

The Volvo XC90 comes with a 14.70 kWh battery.

How fast can the Volvo XC90 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 180 km/h.

What are the Volvo XC90’s length, width and height?

Length 4953 mm, width 1923 mm, height 1771 mm – those are the dimensions of the Volvo XC90.

SsangYong Rexton vs Volvo XC90 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SsangYong Rexton has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41100 £, while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £. That’s a price difference of around 28628 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo XC90 manages with 3.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.20 L. The difference is about 4.70 L per 100 km.

XC90 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a clearly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 253 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.60 s. That’s about 5.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the SsangYong Rexton performs barely noticeable better – reaching 184 km/h, while the Volvo XC90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 709 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 268 Nm difference.

Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Volvo XC90 is hardly perceptible lighter – 2080 kg compared to 2145 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers significantly more room – 784 L compared to 302 L. That’s a difference of about 482 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Rexton performs minimal better – up to 1977 L, which is about 121 L more than the Volvo XC90.

When it comes to payload, SsangYong Rexton slight takes the win – 770 kg compared to 710 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC90 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews SsangYong Rexton

Reviews Volvo XC90

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …

@ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC90

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Tayron

VS

The Volvo XC90 is the serene, safety-obsessed family flagship—roomy, plush and blessed with Volvo’s calm Scandinavian style and efficient hybrid options that make long hauls a pleasure. The VW Tayron, by contrast, is the scrappy value player: sharper to drive, loaded with slick tech for less money, …

Costs and Consumption
Price 41100 - 51300 £	Price 69800 - 84600 £
Consumption L/100km 8.20 L	Consumption L/100km 3.5 - 8.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 71 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 14.70 kWh
co2 214 - 216 g/km	co2 79 - 191 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 70 L	Fuel tank capacity 71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Off-Roader	Body Type SUV
Seats 5 - 7	Seats 7
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2145 - 2180 kg	Curb weight 2080 - 2297 kg
Trunk capacity 236 - 784 L	Trunk capacity 262 - 302 L
Length 4850 mm	Length 4953 mm
Width 1960 mm	Width 1923 mm
Height 1825 mm	Height 1771 mm
Max trunk capacity 1806 - 1977 L	Max trunk capacity 1816 - 1856 L
Payload 655 - 770 kg	Payload 653 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Diesel	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 202 HP	Power HP 250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.60 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed 184 km/h	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 441 Nm	Torque 360 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 148 kW	Power kW 184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity 2157 cm3	Engine capacity 1969 cm3