VS

Suzuki S-Cross vs VW Polo comparison

Compare performance (110 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki S-Cross or VW Polo?

Suzuki S-Cross vs VW Polo: Key differences

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • significantly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Polo is visibly cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,504 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Polo uses 5.1 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Polo offers significantly more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 97 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Polo delivers markedly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.

S-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW Polo is a bit lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,280 kg. The difference is around 137 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers somewhat more boot space – 430 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Polo carries moderately more – 457 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 52 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Polo holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,300
Polo

VW Polo

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 80 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Suzuki S-Cross
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

VW Polo

The Polo is a well-built, comfortable hatchback that blends a refined cabin and composed manners into a compact package. It's easy to live with day to day, offering sensible space, tidy controls and reassuring quality that make it a practical choice for city or longer trips.

details
DB2021AU00726_medium
DB2021AU00728_medium
DB2021AU00732_medium
DB2021AU00735_medium
DB2021AU00736_medium
DB2021AU00741_medium

Reviews VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Michel
13 Jun 2026, 15:24:46

Nice, spacious car with many options available (panoramic roof and travel assist).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Polo is the sharp, no-nonsense hatchback that nails everyday practicality — nimble in town, economical to run and pleasantly composed on the motorway. The VW Taigo swaps a bit of luggage room and rear headroom for SUV flair, higher seating and a more eye-catching cabin, so pick the Polo for …
VW Golf
VW Polo
VS
The Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Polo are two of the brand’s best-known hatchbacks, with the Golf leaning toward greater space, refinement and tech while the Polo focuses on affordability, city-friendly size and economy. This comparison will show where the Golf justifies its extra cost and where …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
VW ID.3
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Polo pits Volkswagen's all-electric compact against its conventional small hatchback, highlighting a choice between emissions-free efficiency and traditional practicality. The ID.3 emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and a spacious cabin, while the Polo offers lower …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Mazda 2
VW Polo
VS
Choosing between the Mazda 2 and the VW Polo comes down to whether you prefer a sporty, driver-focused small hatchback or a more refined, practical everyday car. Both deliver good fuel economy and solid build quality, but the Mazda 2 leans toward engaging handling and style while the VW Polo …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Suzuki S-Cross
VW Polo

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
119 - 138 g/km
co2
116 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,785 mm
Width
1,751 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 405 kg
Payload
432 - 457 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 HP
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
81 kW
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Suzuki S-Cross?

The Suzuki S-Cross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.