Compare performance (110 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki S-Cross or Toyota C-HR?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment is buzzing with competition, and two models that frequently spark debates among enthusiasts are the Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota C-HR. Both vehicles bring their distinctive flair and innovative technology to the table, but which one suits your needs? Let's dive into the details of what these SUVs offer for the model year 2024.
The Suzuki S-Cross is available with two engine types: a full hybrid and a petrol mild hybrid (MHEV). The power output ranges from 116 HP to 129 HP, facilitated by either an automated manual or a manual gearbox. This SUV offers versatility with both front-wheel drive (FWD) and all-wheel drive (AWD) options, delivering maximum speeds between 175 km/h and 195 km/h. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h is achieved in a respectable 9.5 seconds.
On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR provides diverse engine options including full hybrid and plug-in hybrid systems. It features power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 223 HP, driven by Toyota’s trusted continuously variable transmission (CVT). The C-HR accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h between 7.4 to 9.9 seconds, depending on the engine model, with maximum speeds plateauing at 175 km/h to 180 km/h.
Fuel efficiency is a crucial consideration for many SUV buyers. The Suzuki S-Cross offers consumption figures ranging from 5.1 to 5.8 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions between 116 and 131 g/km, classifying it in the CO2 efficiency class D.
In contrast, the Toyota C-HR shines with a full hybrid option consuming as little as 4.7 L/100 km and as low as 0.8 L/100 km when in plug-in hybrid mode, boasting an electric range of up to 68 km. The C-HR emits between 17 and 115 g/km of CO2, achieving a superior efficiency class from B to C, aligning with eco-conscious driving preferences.
Both vehicles are crafted to accommodate five passengers comfortably, with the S-Cross offering a slightly compact body at 4300 mm length, 1785 mm width, and 1580 mm height. Its trunk holds up to 430 liters, an advantage for those seeking noteworthy cargo space in a compact design.
The Toyota C-HR emerges slightly larger with dimensions of 4362 mm in length, 1832 mm in width, and 1558 mm in height. Its trunk capacity varies with configurations, ranging from 350 liters to 447 liters, thus providing flexibility for storage solutions.
Both vehicles impress with sophisticated driving innovations. The Suzuki S-Cross offers dynamic all-wheel-drive capabilities, making it suitable for varying terrains and conditions. It maintains the traditional driving feel with its manual transmission option for those who prefer hands-on control.
The Toyota C-HR, praised for its hybrid technology, enhances driving efficiency with its advanced CVT system, ensuring a seamless and smooth ride. Its plug-in hybrid versions offer an electrifying experience with an appreciable electric-only range, supporting a greener drive.
The decision between the Suzuki S-Cross and Toyota C-HR ultimately rests on individual preferences regarding performance, efficiency, technological innovations, and budget. The S-Cross appeals to those seeking a versatile, all-rounder compact SUV with manual driving options, while the C-HR beckons with its cutting-edge hybrid technology and eco-friendly credentials. Whether prioritizing power or efficiency, both SUVs stand as strong contenders in the vibrant compact SUV market of 2024.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Suzuki S-Cross is visibly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,372 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers considerably more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is moderately lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 225 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers marginally more boot space – 447 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR carries barely more – 425 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
The Toyota C-HR is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.
details
The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
119 - 138 g/km
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,785 mm
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 405 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España