VS

Suzuki Swift vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (82 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swift or Volvo EX30?

Suzuki Swift vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Volvo EX30

3.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Swift

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Swift is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,849 £.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers substantially more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 346 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers substantially more torque with 543 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 431 Nm more.

Swift

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is clearly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 771 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX30 carries noticeably more – 390 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 339 - 475 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Yaris
VS
Ring the bell for a city‑car showdown: the feisty Suzuki Swift takes on the ever‑practical Toyota Yaris. The Swift flirts with sporty handling and cheeky styling, while the Yaris trades pizzazz for polished build, frugal engines (including a sensible hybrid) and the kind of reliability that keeps …
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Suzuki Swift
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Kris
9 Apr 2026, 18:26:38

Superb quality, fun to drive, and every bit of well layed out kit you'll ever need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NickoNamo
22 Dec 2025, 18:10:11

Compact, attractive and—above all—safe car with a modern interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX30 and EX60 represent two different takes on Volvo’s electric SUV lineup: the EX30 is a compact, city-focused, entry-level EV while the EX60 is a larger, mid-size option that emphasizes space, range and family comfort. This comparison cuts through specs and real-world strengths so you …
Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Suzuki Ignis is the cheeky mini‑crossover — tall, practical and rugged enough to shrug off potholes and a weekend’s worth of kit — while the Suzuki Swift is the sprightly hatch that rewards sharper steering, brisk responses and a more engaging drive. Choose the Ignis for visibility, space and …
Fiat 500
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Fiat 500 and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prefer retro Italian charm and compact city style or a more practical, versatile hatchback with sharper handling. This comparison looks at space, fuel economy, driving feel, equipment and running costs to help you decide …
Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift comes down to whether you prioritise interior space and everyday practicality or a punchy, fun-to-drive hatchback with lower running costs. The Jazz is prized for its flexible cabin and comfortable urban manners, while the Swift offers sharper …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 pit a compact, city-focused electric with lively handling against a larger, comfort-oriented electric aimed at family use. This comparison highlights key differences in range, interior space, driving feel and tech to help you choose which suits your needs.
Hyundai i10
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …
Opel Corsa
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Vauxhall Corsa and the Suzuki Swift are two of the UK’s most popular small cars, each promising easy city driving with sensible running costs. This quick comparison looks at what sets them apart in ride, economy, practicality and equipment to help you choose the better fit for your everyday …
Suzuki Swift
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
98 - 110 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,735 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
282 - 296 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
82 HP
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
112 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
61 kW
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Volvo
Is the Suzuki Swift offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.