VS

Suzuki Swift vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (82 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (17100 £ vs 33000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Swift or Volvo EX30?

Suzuki Swift vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

Suzuki Swift

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • decisively cheaper
  • decisively lighter

Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • convincingly more power
  • a bit more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Swift

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki Swift has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 17100 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 33000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15849 £.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 has a convincingly edge – offering 428 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 346 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo EX30 performs minimal better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX30 pulls convincingly stronger with 543 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 431 Nm difference.

Swift

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki Swift is decisively lighter – 1069 kg compared to 1840 kg. The difference is around 771 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo EX30 offers a bit more room – 318 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX30 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1000 L, which is about 20 L more than the Suzuki Swift.

When it comes to payload, Volvo EX30 clearly perceptible takes the win – 390 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Toyota Aygo
VS
If you want a pocket rocket that’s actually practical, the Suzuki Swift mixes sprightly handling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and sensible running costs — ideal for buyers who want fun without sacrificing everyday usability. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, is the cheeky city specialist: cheaper to buy, …
Hyundai i10
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Hyundai i10 is the sensible city slicker — compact, surprisingly roomy for its size, cheap to run and designed to make parking a confidence exercise rather than a stressful workout. The Suzuki Swift is the cheeky, slightly sportier option with sharper handling and bolder looks, so pick it if …
Suzuki Swift
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £33,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.3 kWh
  • Electric Range : 339 - 476 km
details

Suzuki Swift

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.

details
SUZUKI-519
SUZUKI SWIFT-678
SUZUKI SWIFT-954
SUZUKI-058
SUZUKI SWIFT-672
Swift_3

Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Suzuki Swift

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NickoNamo
22 Dec 2025, 18:10:11

Compact, attractive and—above all—safe car with a modern interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Suzuki Swift
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
17100 - 21200 £
Price
33000 - 49100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
co2
98 - 110 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
37 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1069 - 1145 kg
Curb weight
1840 - 1960 kg
Trunk capacity
265 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
3860 mm
Length
4233 mm
Width
1735 mm
Width
1838 mm
Height
1485 - 1510 mm
Height
1550 mm
Max trunk capacity
980 L
Max trunk capacity
1000 L
Payload
282 - 296 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
82 HP
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
112 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
61 kW
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
1197 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Suzuki Ignis
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Suzuki Ignis is the cheeky mini‑crossover — tall, practical and rugged enough to shrug off potholes and a weekend’s worth of kit — while the Suzuki Swift is the sprightly hatch that rewards sharper steering, brisk responses and a more engaging drive. Choose the Ignis for visibility, space and …
Suzuki Swift
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Suzuki Swift and Toyota Yaris stand out with their unique blend of style and efficiency. While the Suzuki Swift boasts a sporty design and agile handling, the Toyota Yaris offers advanced safety features and a more spacious interior. Ultimately, both cars …
Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Suzuki Swift and Suzuki Vitara go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Dacia Sandero
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the Dacia Sandero emerges as a spacious and practical choice, offering impressive value for money with its versatile interior and economical engines. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swift brings a sportier flair to the segment, boasting agile handling and a peppy …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift stand out with their unique blends of style and practicality. The Picanto offers a more spacious interior with user-friendly tech features, making it an excellent option for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Swift impresses with …
Honda Jazz
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Honda Jazz and Suzuki Swift stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Jazz boasts a versatile interior with its innovative Magic Seats, allowing for exceptional cargo flexibility, while the Swift captivates with its sporty design and …
Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
In the rapidly growing electric vehicle market, the Volvo EX30 and EX40 stand out with their unique blend of style and sustainability. While the EX30 offers a smaller, more urban-friendly footprint, the EX40 boasts additional space and features tailored for family-oriented drivers. Both models …
What drivetrain options does the Suzuki Swift have?

The Suzuki Swift is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.