VS

Suzuki Vitara vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Mazda CX-5?

Suzuki Vitara vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Vitara

Mazda CX-5 vs. Suzuki Vitara: A Detailed SUV Showdown

As the SUV market continues to thrive, two models often capture the attention of consumers looking for a blend of style, performance, and practicality: the Mazda CX-5 and the Suzuki Vitara. Both of these SUVs offer a unique set of features that cater to a variety of needs and preferences. In this article, we delve into their technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance to help you make an informed decision.

CX-5

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-5 is known for its sleek, modern design, exuding a premium look with its smooth curves and refined details. Measuring 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height, it provides a substantial presence on the road. The CX-5's interior is equally impressive, offering a trunk capacity of 510 to 522 liters, catering to the needs of families and adventurers alike.

On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara offers a more compact option, with a length of 4185 mm, a width of 1775 mm, and a height of 1595 mm. This makes it more suitable for urban environments where parking space is limited. Its trunk capacity ranges from 289 to 375 liters, ideal for daily errands and short trips.

Vitara

Engine and Performance

The Mazda CX-5 offers a range of engines, including petrol mild hybrid electric vehicles (MHEV) and diesel options. With power outputs ranging from 150 to 194 HP, and torque between 213 to 445 Nm, the CX-5 is all about delivering robust performance. It comes with both manual and automatic transmissions and varies between front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive systems. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h spans from 9.2 to 11.1 seconds, depending on the version, with a maximum speed reaching up to 208 km/h.

The Suzuki Vitara provides a more simplified engine lineup with petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, offering power outputs of 116 and 129 HP. The torque figure stands at a competitive 235 Nm, with a choice between manual and automated manual transmissions. The Vitara accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 9.5 to 12.7 seconds, with a maximum speed up to 190 km/h, which suffices for typical daily driving experiences.

CX-5

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is a strong suit for both vehicles. The Mazda CX-5 boasts a consumption rate of 5.6 to 7.6 L/100km, aligning with its CO2 emissions between 146 to 173 g/km. Despite having a larger engine capacity, the CX-5 manages its efficiency well, making it an appealing choice for those who prioritize performance without compromising on eco-friendliness.

In comparison, the Suzuki Vitara prides itself on exceptional fuel economy with a consumption of 5.0 to 5.6 L/100km. CO2 emissions range from 113 to 129 g/km, positioning it as a more environmentally conscious choice for urban dwellers and long-distance commuters alike.

Vitara

Conclusion

Both the Mazda CX-5 and Suzuki Vitara offer compelling packages in the SUV segment. The CX-5 is perfect for those who desire a bolder presence and a potent engine lineup, whereas the Vitara caters to those who seek a more compact, fuel-efficient option with hybrid flexibility. Ultimately, the choice comes down to your personal needs, whether it be performance or practicality, making either option a worthy contender in the bustling SUV arena.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki Vitara and the Toyota Yaris Cross both aim at buyers wanting compact SUVs, but they take different approaches: the Vitara leans toward rugged simplicity and practical space, while the Yaris Cross focuses on urban refinement and hybrid efficiency. I’ll compare their practicality, driving …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Vitara

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki Vitara is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,420 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Vitara uses 5.3 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers visibly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers visibly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 69 Nm more.

Vitara

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is noticeably lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 374 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers somewhat more boot space – 466 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 176 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Vitara holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 344 - 426 km
details
Suzuki Vitara
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki Vitara

The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.

details
Suzuki_Vitara_002
Suzuki_Vitara_020
Suzuki_Vitara_039
Suzuki_Vitara_023
Suzuki_Vitara_004
Vitara_9

Reviews Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
Kattia
17 Jun 2026, 20:01:52

The new Vitara is beautiful, almost like the RAV4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
yannick h
13 Jun 2026, 15:09:09

The Vitara is powerful, light and practical, with a 4-cylinder engine; flaws: plastic upper door trim and a less modern appearance.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bud
5 Jun 2026, 11:14:19

De Vitara voelt aan alle kanten royaler aan dan de TYC. Geeft duidelijk meer zicht rondom de auto. De TYC is zeker in de bebouwde kom superzuinig. Het rijden met de Vitara geeft het gevoel in een grotere auto te rijden dan de TYC.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jolanta
4 Feb 2026, 09:37:41

A very pleasant car for an affordable price. The only downside is poorly soundproofed doors and windows.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Polet
14 Jan 2026, 00:08:10

Proven reliability — it’s sold on every continent, and a real pleasure as a 4x4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Jeep Avenger
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Suzuki Vitara are two compact SUVs that take different routes to the same goal: city-friendly size with some crossover capability — the Avenger emphasizes modern design and electrified options, while the Vitara leans on proven practicality and value. This short comparison …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki Vitara? This quick, no-nonsense comparison focuses on real-world space, practicality, running costs and driving feel to show which crossover suits your everyday needs.
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5
VS
Comparing the Jaguar F‑Pace and the Mazda CX‑5 pits a sporty, luxury-oriented midsize SUV against a sharply styled, value-focused compact crossover — a matchup of premium feel and driving dynamics versus everyday practicality and efficiency. Choose the F‑Pace if you prioritize performance, brand …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a matchup: the compact, city-friendly Suzuki Vitara squares off against the RAV4-based Suzuki Across to settle whether you want sprightly urban agility or long-range hybrid practicality. The Vitara tempts with a cheeky drive and sensible price, while the Across answers with superior fuel …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Suzuki Vitara
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 137 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 425 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Mazda
Is the Suzuki Vitara offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.