Compare performance (184 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Toyota Proace Transporter?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Suzuki Vitara is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Toyota Proace Transporter costs 31,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,064 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Vitara uses 5.3 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Toyota Proace Transporter with 6.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Suzuki Vitara is significantly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 23.8 kWh/100km for the Toyota Proace Transporter. That’s a difference of about 8.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers moderately more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 77 km more than the Toyota Proace Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers moderately more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Toyota Proace Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Proace Transporter delivers a bit more torque with 370 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 63 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Toyota Proace Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is noticeably lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,656 kg. The difference is around 401 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace Transporter carries considerably more – 1,323 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 898 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
detailsThe Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
Electric Range
349 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, A, G
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Toyota
|