VS

Toyota Aygo vs Citroen C3 comparison

Compare performance (116 HP vs 113 HP), boot space and price (18,800 £ vs 13,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota Aygo or Citroen C3?

Toyota Aygo vs Citroen C3: Key differences

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Aygo

The Ultimate Showdown: Citroen C3 vs Toyota Aygo

The automotive market is teeming with compact cars designed for urban commuting, but two stand out among the crowd: the Citroen C3 and the Toyota Aygo. With different approaches to design, performance, and technology, both vehicles appeal to a diverse demographic. In this comparison, we'll delve into their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall driving experience to help you decide which compact car is the better fit for your lifestyle.

C3

Design and Dimensions

When it comes to dimensions, the Citroen C3 measures in at 4015 mm in length, 1755 mm in width, and 1567 mm in height. It boasts a spacious trunk capacity of 310 liters, catering well to daily needs. In contrast, the Toyota Aygo takes a more compact approach, with length, width, and height measured at 3700 mm, 1740 mm, and 1510 mm, respectively. The Aygo’s trunk offers a smaller capacity of 231 liters, making it more suitable for city dwellers who prioritize maneuverability over storage space.

Aygo

Engine Performance and Efficiency

The Citroen C3 presents a variety of engine options, including petrol, electric, and petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle), with power outputs ranging from 101 to 113 HP. Its fuel consumption sits between 5.5 to 5.6 L/100 km, depending on the variant, while the electric model boasts a range of 320 to 326 km, making it an appealing choice for eco-conscious drivers. The C3’s acceleration is impressive, capable of reaching 100 km/h in just 9.9 seconds with higher variants.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo is equipped with a petrol engine that produces 72 HP, paired with a consumption of 4.8 to 4.9 L/100 km. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h lags behind the C3, taking around 15.5 to 15.6 seconds, which may deter those seeking a more spirited drive. However, the Aygo’s lightweight design, with a curb weight of just 1015 kg, enhances its agility in city driving conditions.

C3

Transmission and Drive Type

Both models offer a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. The Citroen C3 features a robust dual-clutch automatic option, improving driving comfort and efficiency. In contrast, the Aygo comes with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), providing smooth acceleration and responsiveness in urban traffic.

Both cars utilize a front-wheel drive configuration, but the power delivery in the Citroen C3, with its more powerful engines, tends to deliver a snappier driving experience compared to the lighter but less powerful Toyota Aygo.

Aygo

Technology and Features

Citroen has equipped the C3 with modern technology and driver assistance features, catering to drivers who appreciate connectivity and safety. With its advanced infotainment system, touchscreen interface, and smartphone integration capabilities, the C3 stands out as a tech-savvy option for younger consumers. Its climate control, navigation, and safety features are designed to enhance overall comfort and driving confidence.

Meanwhile, the Toyota Aygo retains a more stripped-down tech approach but includes essential features aimed at providing a reliable driving experience. Its infotainment system is straightforward and easy to use, fitting well with the Aygo's youthful and practical branding. Although it lacks some of the advanced tech of the C3, it excels in delivering no-fuss utility.

C3

Safety and Environmental Impact

Safety ratings for both vehicles are commendable, with the Citroen C3 offering a variety of standard safety features such as lane assist and emergency braking. The CO2 emissions for the C3 hover at around 126 g/km, making it a fairly eco-friendly choice compared to its competitors.

The Toyota Aygo, with its CO2 efficiency class rated at C, emits roughly 108 to 112 g/km of CO2, showcasing its own eco-credentials in the compact segment. While not as complex as the C3, it serves as a solid option for urban environments where low emissions are sought after.

Aygo

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Citroen C3 and Toyota Aygo each present their own strengths and weaknesses. The C3 is better suited for those who seek a blend of performance, space, and modern technology, making it ideal for a family or those who require more versatility in their vehicle.

Conversely, the Aygo shines in urban agility and efficiency, perfect for city dwellers who value simplicity and straightforward functionality. Ultimately, your choice will depend on your specific needs—whether that leans more towards space and tech or agility and everyday practicality.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aygo

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen C3 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Aygo uses 3.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

C3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo offers only slightly more power – delivering 116 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Aygo is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.2 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.9 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C3 delivers significantly more torque with 205 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.

Aygo

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Citroen C3 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Aygo is somewhat lighter – 1,090 kg compared to 1,226 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen C3 offers clearly more boot space – 310 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen C3 carries barely more – 423 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £13,700
C3

Citroen C3

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 101 - 113 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 212 - 325 km
Toyota Aygo
Citroen C3

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Toyota Aygo

The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.

details

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a cheeky little city car that turns heads with its bold, quirky styling and a surprisingly comfy, well-thought-out interior. It’s an ideal companion for urban life — easy to park, friendly to drive and built to make everyday trips feel a bit more fun without breaking the bank.

details
Toyota Aygo
Citroen C3

Costs and Consumption

Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 g/km
co2
0 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,090 kg
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
Trunk capacity
231 L
Trunk capacity
310 L
Length
-
Length
4,015 mm
Width
1,740 mm
Width
1,755 mm
Height
-
Height
1,567 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,220 L
Payload
420 kg
Payload
227 - 423 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 HP
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
132 km/h
Torque
120 Nm
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 kW
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Citroen
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.