Compare performance (68 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (15300 £ vs 15500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Picanto or Toyota Aygo?
The compact city car segment has gained immense popularity, providing urban drivers with an efficient and fun driving experience. Among the most prominent contenders in this market are the Kia Picanto and the Toyota Aygo. Both vehicles boast unique features and innovations, but how do they stack up against each other? Let’s dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
Starting with the exterior, the Kia Picanto is designed as a stylish hatchback, with a length of 3605 mm, a width of 1595 mm, and a height of 1485 mm. It offers a modern and youthful appearance, which makes it appealing to younger buyers.
On the flip side, the Toyota Aygo features a distinctive SUV silhouette with a slightly longer length of 3700 mm, a width of 1740 mm, and an overall height of 1510 mm. The Aygo’s bolder design elements give it a more robust presence on the road compared to the Picanto.
When it comes to engines, both vehicles offer petrol options, but they differ slightly in performance. The Kia Picanto is available with engines that deliver between 63 to 79 HP. This power comes from either a 998 cc or a 1197 cc engine with torque rating of 95 Nm and 115 Nm respectively. The Picanto can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 13.1 to 18.2 seconds, depending on the engine variant selected.
In contrast, the Toyota Aygo packs a punch with a 998 cc engine, delivering 72 HP and a torque output of 93 Nm. The Aygo can reach 0 to 100 km/h in 15.5 to 15.6 seconds, which is slightly slower than the Picanto. Despite this, the Aygo’s fuel consumption is impressively efficient, averaging between 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km.
The Kia Picanto offers both manual and automated manual transmission options, giving drivers the flexibility to choose their preferred driving style. It is also equipped with front-wheel drive, enhancing its maneuverability in city traffic.
The Toyota Aygo, on the other hand, features a CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) option in addition to a manual gearbox. The CVT is designed for smooth acceleration and improved fuel efficiency, making it an excellent choice for urban commuting.
The interior of the Kia Picanto is ergonomic and spacious for a compact car. It can comfortably seat up to five passengers, making it a practical option for small families or groups. The trunk capacity stands at 255 liters, offering adequate space for groceries or luggage.
In comparison, the Toyota Aygo accommodates four passengers and comes with a smaller trunk capacity of 231 liters. Although it can carry fewer passengers, the Aygo's interior is designed with comfort and usability in mind, featuring modern infotainment systems and driver-oriented controls.
Looking at environmental efficiency, the Kia Picanto scores a CO2 efficiency class of D with emissions ranging from 118 to 130 g/km. Its fuel economy, however, shows variability, with consumption figures around 5.2 to 5.7 L/100km.
The Toyota Aygo impresses with a CO2 efficiency class of C and lower emission figures of 108 to 112 g/km, indicating better performance in terms of environmental impact. Additionally, its fuel consumption is more economical, averaging around 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km, making it a more eco-friendly choice for city driving.
In the battle of the compact urban cars, both the Kia Picanto and the Toyota Aygo bring solid features to the table. The Picanto is a versatile hatchback with good power and interior space, while the Aygo excels in fuel efficiency and environmental impact.
Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles will depend on personal preference in terms of styling, driving experience, and specific needs. Whether you opt for the dynamic Kia Picanto or the spirited Toyota Aygo, you can expect a reliable and enjoyable driving experience.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Kia Picanto has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15300 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 15500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 205 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 3.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Kia Picanto with 5.60 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo has a clearly edge – offering 116 HP compared to 68 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Aygo is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.20 s, while the Kia Picanto takes 14.60 s. That’s about 5.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Kia Picanto performs barely noticeable better – reaching 162 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota Aygo pulls to a small extent stronger with 120 Nm compared to 96 Nm. That’s about 24 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Kia Picanto offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is to a small extent lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1124 kg. The difference is around 109 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Kia Picanto offers slight more room – 255 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 24 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Kia Picanto performs a bit better – up to 1010 L, which is about 181 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Toyota Aygo evident takes the win – 420 kg compared to 332 kg. That’s a difference of about 88 kg.
The Toyota Aygo sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia Picanto is a cheeky city hatch that squeezes surprising style, practicality and a smile-inducing drive into a pocket-friendly package. It’s ideal for urban buyers who want fuss-free running, effortless parking and a car that punches above its class without pretending to be anything it’s not.
details
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15300 - 19300 £
|
Price
15500 - 24300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
127 - 135 g/km
|
co2
85 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1124 - 1131 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 - 1090 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
255 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
3605 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1595 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1485 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1010 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
253 - 332 kg
|
Payload
345 - 420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
68 HP
|
Power HP
72 - 116 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.6 - 17.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 162 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
96 Nm
|
Torque
93 - 120 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
50 kW
|
Power kW
53 - 85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España