Compare performance (116 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (18,800 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota Aygo or Suzuki Swift?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Suzuki Swift arrives with the kind of sporty swagger that hints at a livelier character, while the Toyota Aygo prefers a cheeky, fashionable look that turns heads in tight urban streets. Both have distinct identities: one feels poised and grown-up, the other playful and smile-inducing. Pick your vibe and the choice becomes as much about attitude as it is about practicality.
The Aygo makes city life effortless with a compact footprint and an instinct for squeezing into awkward parking slots, making it an ideal companion for daily commutes and short trips. The Swift is no slouch in town either, but its more planted presence gives added confidence when you leave the stop-and-go and head onto faster roads. If your daily routine mixes tight streets with open stretches, think about which balance of nimbleness and composure you prefer.
Step inside and you feel the difference in intent: the Swift’s cabin leans toward practicality and a touch of refinement, offering a more grown-up environment for longer stints behind the wheel. The Aygo injects personality with bright accents and a compact, cheerful layout that suits short hops and city errands, though it asks a bit more compromise from rear passengers. For families or those who regularly carry gear, the way space is used may be the deciding factor.
On a winding backroad the Swift rewards with a livelier, more assured demeanor that invites a spirited drive without fussing the occupants. The Aygo delights with a light-footed, agile character that’s honest and entertaining where big-speed bravado isn’t required, but it won’t pretend to be a long-distance grand tourer. In short, one leans toward engagement and composure, the other toward city-minded fun and pragmatism.
Both offer sensible running profiles for drivers who prioritise low hassle and straightforward maintenance, yet they appeal to different ownership philosophies: one aims to be an economical, easy-to-live-with companion, the other to be a cost-conscious gateway into stylish, useful motoring. Equipment levels and options packages will influence perceived value more than headline figures, so look closely at real-world features rather than just the sticker. Either way, buyers get a dependable, no-nonsense small car that’s cheap to love and relatively cheap to keep.
If your life revolves around tight city streets, short commutes and a desire to stand out with a quirky, fashionable ride, the Aygo is tuned to that role and does it with charm. If you need something that can double as a comfortable daily driver for longer trips while still being small enough for town, the Swift’s broader usefulness will appeal to small families and commuters who demand a bit more composure. Match the car’s character to your typical day and you’ll rarely be disappointed.
We’ve laid out the personalities, the daily realities and the driver profiles — now it’s time to see which model earns the DriveDuel Champion crown. Read on for our final verdict and a side-by-side summary that will make choosing your next small car a lot easier. Your perfect city companion might be just a scroll away.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Suzuki Swift is barely cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,706 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Aygo uses 3.7 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Suzuki Swift with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Aygo offers markedly more power – delivering 116 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Aygo delivers very slightly more torque with 120 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 8 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Suzuki Swift offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is only slightly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,090 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Aygo carries visibly more – 420 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.
The Toyota Aygo stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
|
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 g/km
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,090 kg
|
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,740 mm
|
Width
1,735 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
420 kg
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
120 Nm
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España