Compare performance (223 HP vs 243 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR or Ford Kuga?
As the SUV segment continues to grow, two promising contenders, the Ford Kuga and the Toyota C-HR, are making headlines for their blend of style, performance, and innovative technology. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these popular models, focusing on technical aspects, innovations, and overall driving experience.
Starting with pricing, the Ford Kuga is available at a variety of price points ranging from €39,950 to €52,200, depending on the variant. In contrast, the Toyota C-HR is slightly more affordable, with prices ranging from €34,990 to €48,990. Both automakers offer multiple trims, providing an array of features to suit different budgets.
The Ford Kuga comes with several engine options: a petrol engine, a full hybrid, and a plug-in hybrid. Power output ranges from 150 HP in the base model to a potent 243 HP in the top-end variant. The Kuga’s acceleration of 0-100 km/h can be achieved in as little as 7.3 seconds, making it quite competitive in its class.
The Toyota C-HR offers a range of hybrid solutions as well, with power outputs from 140 HP to 223 HP. Acceleration reaches 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds for the more powerful variants. The C-HR prides itself on excellent fuel efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100 km.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Kuga's hybrid variants are impressive. The plug-in hybrid model boasts consumption figures as low as 0.9 L/100 km and CO2 emissions as low as 20 g/km. Its electric range reaches up to 69 km, allowing for significant emissions-free driving.
Meanwhile, the C-HR's fuel consumption rates are commendable as well, with figures starting at 4.7 L/100 km. The overall CO2 emissions stand at a competitive 19 g/km for its plug-in variant. The C-HR also offers an electric range of around 67 km, making it an efficient choice for urban driving.
Both models can accommodate five passengers comfortably, but the interior design and cargo space are noteworthy aspects in this comparison. The Ford Kuga boasts a generous trunk capacity of 412 liters, making it ideal for families or road trips. In contrast, the Toyota C-HR offers a trunk capacity that ranges up to 447 liters, slightly edging the Kuga in this department.
In terms of interior materials and design, Ford's approach leans toward a more functional layout with intuitive technology integration, while Toyota emphasizes a premium feel with elegant styling and user-friendly features.
Both the Ford Kuga and the Toyota C-HR are equipped with modern technological innovations. The Kuga offers advanced driver-assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, and a state-of-the-art infotainment system with smartphone integration.
On the other hand, the C-HR showcases Toyota’s cutting-edge safety features, including Toyota Safety Sense, which comes standard across various trims. This package includes lane departure alert, automatic high beams, and a pre-collision system that enhances driving safety.
The Ford Kuga is designed to deliver a dynamic driving experience, especially with its available all-wheel-drive option, providing better stability and control in diverse driving conditions. With a maximum speed reaching up to 200 km/h, the Kuga is built for performance enthusiasts.
Conversely, the Toyota C-HR’s lower center of gravity lends itself to agile handling, making it particularly enjoyable to drive on winding roads. Its top speed caps at 180 km/h, reflecting a focus on efficiency and comfort rather than outright power.
The comparison between the Ford Kuga and the Toyota C-HR ultimately comes down to individual preferences. The Kuga stands out for its powerful engine options and spacious interior, making it a fantastic choice for families or those needing additional cargo space. Meanwhile, the C-HR impresses with its hybrid efficiency, cutting-edge safety features, and agile driving characteristics.
For buyers leaning towards a more performance-oriented SUV, the Ford Kuga is the go-to choice, while those seeking a stylish, efficient, and tech-savvy vehicle may find the Toyota C-HR hard to resist. Both models represent the best of their brands, appealing to a wide range of consumers in the ever-competitive SUV market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota C-HR is somewhat cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,108 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Kuga offers barely more range – reaching up to 68 km, about 2 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers only slightly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is only slightly lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries noticeably more – 550 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
The Ford Kuga is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España