VS

Toyota C-HR vs Hyundai Kona comparison

Compare performance (223 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR or Hyundai Kona?

Toyota C-HR vs Hyundai Kona: Key differences

Toyota C-HR

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Hyundai Kona

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

C-HR

Hyundai Kona vs Toyota C-HR — two compact SUVs, two clear philosophies

The Hyundai Kona and the Toyota C-HR arrive at the same segment from opposite directions: the Kona prioritises everyday space, straightforward usability and a comfortable, low-stress experience, while the C-HR sells a compact, efficient and design-forward package with a stronger focus on economy. That difference is visible the moment you open the doors—the Kona feels purpose-built for hauling people and stuff, the C-HR for looking good and drinking as little fuel as possible. Each car brings modern safety and infotainment but applies them differently, so your priorities—practicality versus image and efficiency—determine which feels like the better fit. This comparison will focus on how those philosophies translate to real-life comfort, usability, long-distance behaviour and buyer fit rather than spec sheets.

Kona

Driving character and everyday usability

The Hyundai Kona drives like an accommodating companion: light steering, predictable responses and a suspension tuned for calm city and regional roads rather than corner-carving thrills. The Toyota C-HR rewards precise inputs with a more taut, composed feel but exposes its drivetrain personality under load—very economical, yet sometimes noisy and insistent when you demand strong acceleration. In town both are easy to place, but the Kona’s gentler steering and smaller turning circle make tight manoeuvres less stressful; the C-HR’s sharper steering makes it feel more alert but also less forgiving in stop‑start parking. If you prize relaxed commuting and easy parking choose the Kona; if you prefer a sharper, more engaging steering feel and accept some drivetrain quirks, the C-HR leans in that direction.

C-HR

Cabin comfort, materials and rear-seat reality

The interior of the Toyota C-HR aims higher in perceived quality with cleaner graphics and tactile touches that feel a step up when you sit in the front seats, giving it a slightly more premium presence. The Hyundai Kona, by contrast, trades a bit of that perceived polish for a more practical, roomy cabin layout—controls are clearer, displays are easy to read and storage feels sensible rather than showy. Crucially, rear-seat experience separates them: the Kona genuinely offers more head- and leg-room and a brighter feel for rear passengers, whereas the C-HR’s sloping roofline and smaller windows make the back feel tighter and darker. So for tall passengers or frequent rear-seat occupants the Kona will be noticeably more comfortable, while couples or solo commuters who value style and front-cabin ambience will appreciate the C-HR’s presentation.

Kona

Practicality and everyday luggage handling

Here the Kona’s strengths are obvious: a larger, more usable boot, sensible opening and lower sill make loading shopping, buggies or suitcases a less awkward task than in the C-HR. The C-HR’s cargo space is more compromised by its design, with a higher loading lip and a shallower, more awkward shape that punishes bulky items—PHEV variants amplify that compromise further. The Kona also offers more flexible rear-seat folding arrangements on higher trims, which translates into real-world adaptability on weekends or holidays. If you frequently carry gear, family kit or need flexible cargo space, the Kona is the more pragmatic choice; the C-HR is acceptable for lighter, design-conscious urban use but feels limiting for regular utility needs.

C-HR

Long-distance behaviour, efficiency and running impressions

On longer journeys the Kona tends to deliver a quieter, more relaxed experience—particularly in its electric form—making motorway miles feel less tiring and more effortless. The C-HR is economical in operation and excels at low-consumption driving, especially in hybrid or plug‑in form, which benefits commuters and company-car buyers, but its drivetrain can become noticeably vocal when pushed and the cabin can feel busier under sustained full-throttle demands. Both cars are stable on the motorway, but the Kona’s calmer noise profile and more compliant ride edge it towards greater cruising comfort, while the C-HR rewards those who prioritise low running costs and short electric commutes despite the trade-off in noise under load. Choose the C-HR when fuel efficiency and PHEV tax/commute benefits are primary; pick the Kona for quieter, less tiring long-distance cruising and more relaxed highway composure.

Kona

Who should pick which car — buyer-fit and practical recommendations

If your life involves family school runs, regular luggage, rear passengers or you simply want a forgiving, easy-to-live-with compact SUV, the Hyundai Kona will likely satisfy more days of your week with less compromise. If you are a design-conscious city commuter, a company-car driver who benefits from low CO2 and electric commuting, or someone who values a slightly more premium front cabin and sharper steering, the Toyota C-HR is a compelling, efficient choice despite its tighter rear seats and smaller boot. Both cars have clear strengths, so match the Kona to people who prioritise space, comfort and straightforward usability, and match the C-HR to buyers who prioritise economy, looks and a refined front-cabin feel. The technical comparison that follows will make the specific performance, range and equipment trade-offs easier to quantify for your decision.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C-HR

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Hyundai Kona is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,077 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona offers considerably more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 444 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

Kona

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers marginally more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

C-HR

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is very slightly lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers very slightly more boot space – 466 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries a bit more – 490 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 380 - 510 km
details
Toyota C-HR
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
Jan
16 May 2026, 20:51:01

Great driving comfort, admittedly short trips, but above all a cool impression.

Rav is for wimps.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
Hans
23 Apr 2026, 11:02:05

More modern car with much more advanced technology than the S-Cross. The S-Cross is functional, economical and good, but dated.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gorguet
10 Apr 2026, 07:38:34

Good car overall, but the finish isn't top‑notch — the paint is very fragile and chips at the slightest knock.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 go head-to-head in the compact electric crossover ring, pitting Kona’s tried-and-tested practicality against the EV3’s fresh-faced ambition. Which wins your driveway comes down to whether you want proven comfort and range or a cheeky new contender with surprising …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Prius
VS
In this DriveDuel showdown we pit the sharp, coupe‑like Toyota C‑HR against the evergreen Toyota Prius to see whether style and urban swagger can outshine outright thriftiness. Choose the C‑HR for crossover looks, punchy handling and personality; pick the Prius for class‑leading fuel economy, …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon is the bargain city-slicker — a compact, sensible B‑SUV that maximizes practicality and running costs for urban buyers, while the Hyundai Kona steps up with sharper styling, punchier engines (and even AWD and electrified options) for drivers who want a bit more sparkle and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Niro
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers deciding between sportier looks and practical efficiency. Though they share similar underpinnings and offer hybrid and electric options, they differ in driving dynamics, interior space, and feature priorities — …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Sportage
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Sportage go head-to-head in the compact-SUV ring — the Kona is cheeky, city-savvy and punchy, while the Sportage leans into grown-up comfort and family-friendly practicality. We’ll break down which one gives you sharper driving thrills, better everyday usability and the …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: one offers quiet, premium refinement while the other dazzles with bold styling and better value. We put them through real-world checks — styling, comfort, tech and running costs — so you can decide whether to pick …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like the posh roommate you suddenly inherited — plush cabin, hushed hybrid powertrain and a dashboard that whispers premium — while the Toyota C‑HR plays the affordable style rebel with quirky looks and surprisingly practical packaging. Choose the LBX for serene luxury and badge …
Toyota C-HR
Hyundai Kona

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
66 km
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
52 - 116 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,832 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 425 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Hyundai
What drivetrain options does the Toyota C-HR have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.