@ Toyota Motor Corporation
VS

Toyota C-HR vs MG HS/EHS – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Toyota C-HR or MG HS/EHS fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C-HR @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG HS/EHS has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Toyota C-HR costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 5143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Toyota C-HR with 0.80 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

As for range, the MG HS/EHS performs distinct better – achieving up to 100 km, about 32 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a somewhat edge – offering 272 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 49 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS/EHS is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the MG HS/EHS performs barely noticeable better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

C-HR @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Toyota C-HR is slight lighter – 1505 kg compared to 1625 kg. The difference is around 120 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG HS/EHS offers to a small extent more room – 507 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG HS/EHS performs distinct better – up to 1484 L, which is about 329 L more than the Toyota C-HR.

When it comes to payload, Toyota C-HR slight takes the win – 425 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG HS/EHS proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG HS/EHS is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,000
default

MG HS/EHS

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 7.6 L
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

Toyota C-HR

5 (1)
rate

The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr @ Toyota Motor Corporation

MG HS/EHS

5 (1)
rate

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details

Reviews MG HS/EHS

Mac Finn 29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Top Car Comparisons

@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla are two compelling options for drivers seeking reliability and style. While the C-HR boasts a bold, crossover design with a higher driving position and sporty handling, the Corolla remains a benchmark in compact sedans, offering practicality and exceptional …
Toyota C-HR
MG HS/EHS
C-HR @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 42800 £
Price
24000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
17 - 115 g/km
co2
14 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
Curb weight
1625 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
Length
4362 mm
Length
4655 - 4670 mm
Width
1832 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
Height
1663 - 1664 mm
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1484 L
Payload
375 - 425 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Power HP
170 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 9.6 s
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 195 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
275 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Power kW
125 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
Engine capacity
1496 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, D
Brand
Toyota
Brand
MG

Similar Comparisons

@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR stand out with their unique blend of style and performance. The LBX offers a more luxurious interior and advanced features, while the C-HR remains a budget-friendly option that doesn't compromise on flair. Ultimately, …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Niro
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR present compelling choices for eco-conscious drivers seeking a stylish and efficient crossover. The Niro, with its hybrid and electric options, emphasizes fuel economy and a spacious interior, making it ideal for families or those with cargo needs. Meanwhile, the C-HR …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Captur
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Renault Captur and Toyota C-HR stand out with their distinct designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Captur impresses with its customizable interior options and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a practical choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus UX
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR stand out with their distinctive designs and hybrid options. While the Lexus UX offers a more premium interior and advanced technology features, the Toyota C-HR appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its sporty styling and …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Juke and Toyota C-HR both offer unique appeal but cater to different driving preferences. The Juke stands out with its distinctive design and agile handling, appealing to those who favor a more spirited drive. Meanwhile, the C-HR impresses with its …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it an ideal choice for families. On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR impresses with its bold design and fuel efficiency, appealing to younger, style-conscious buyers. …
MG HS/EHS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Think of the MG HS (and its EHS plug‑in hybrid) as the sensible, budget‑friendly family SUV — roomy, comfortable and annoyingly practical — while the MG MGS5 EV flips the script with instant electric torque, sharper handling and far more tech for your money. Pick the HS/EHS if you want proven value …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
MG HS/EHS
VS
Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the MG HS/EHS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
What drivetrain options does the Toyota C-HR have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.