VS

Toyota RAV4 vs Jeep Avenger comparison

Compare performance (309 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (37,700 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota RAV4 or Jeep Avenger?

Toyota RAV4 vs Jeep Avenger: Key differences

Toyota RAV4

4.8 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

RAV4

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Jeep Avenger is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Toyota RAV4 costs 37,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,163 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota RAV4 uses 1.3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Jeep Avenger offers considerably more range – reaching up to 400 km, about 263 km more than the Toyota RAV4.

Avenger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota RAV4 offers clearly more power – delivering 309 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 153 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota RAV4 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.

RAV4

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is significantly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,655 kg. The difference is around 475 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota RAV4 offers noticeably more boot space – 514 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 134 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota RAV4 carries a bit more – 610 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 108 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota RAV4 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,700
RAV4

Toyota RAV4

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 185 - 309 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.3 - 5.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 133 - 137 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …
Suzuki Across
Toyota RAV4
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Across and the Toyota RAV4 comes down to whether you prioritise an efficient plug‑in hybrid or a more conventional, broader compact SUV package. The Across is Suzuki’s take on the RAV4 PHEV with strong electric range and fuel economy, while the RAV4 offers a wider model …
Toyota RAV4
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Toyota RAV4

The Toyota RAV4 is a well-rounded compact SUV that pairs everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed ride and generous cargo space, making it a sensible choice for families and active lifestyles. Its strong reputation for reliability, efficient drivetrains, and straightforward technology gives it wide appeal whether you value economy, comfort, or capability.

details
73487-rav4prexterior34front-web-lr
73488-rav4prexterior34rear-web-lr
77636-2023rav4ext001-web-lr
73489-rav4printeriordashboard-web-lr

Reviews Toyota RAV4

4.8 (10 Reviews)
rate
guadedua
1 Jun 2026, 11:18:08

Toyota's reliability, practicality and fuel efficiency are always an asset and a safe purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mariana González
5 Jan 2026, 23:15:27

I love it — it’s super comfortable, I’ve never had any trouble with it, very reliable and stable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Corolla Touring Sports is the pragmatic estate: lower, nimbler and generally more economical, with a clever loadbay that keeps luggage organized without the SUV tax. The RAV4, by contrast, gives you a taller driving position, more interior room and light off‑road chops — it's the tougher, more …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
BYD Seal U
Toyota RAV4
VS
BYD Seal U is a sleek, driver‑focused electric newcomer that delivers brisk, silent acceleration, cutting‑edge tech and impressive running‑cost savings — it’s the car that makes you forget what an internal‑combustion soundtrack sounded like. The Toyota RAV4 sticks to its strengths: rugged, roomy …
Toyota RAV4
Dacia Bigster
VS
Put the ever-reliable Toyota RAV4 next to the newcomer Dacia Bigster and you get two sensible SUVs with very different appeals: the RAV4 delivers years of refinement, hybrid efficiency and a quietly premium cabin, while the Bigster trades polish for cavernous space and a wallet-friendly price. If …
Toyota RAV4
VW Tayron
VS
In the left corner, the Toyota RAV4 brings proven reliability, frugal hybrid powertrains and genuine all‑road grit — the sensible choice if you value resale, low running costs and a knack for getting off the beaten track. Opposite it, the VW Tayron punches above its class with sharp styling, a …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Nissan X-Trail
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Nissan X-Trail and the Toyota RAV4 are two of the most popular compact SUVs, each offering a distinct balance of comfort, space and driving character. This comparison will focus on their real-world strengths—practicality, fuel efficiency, safety tech and driving feel—to help you choose which …
Toyota RAV4
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,700 - 54,200 £
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.3 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
133 - 137 km
Electric Range
400 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
30 - 121 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,655 - 1,960 kg
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Trunk capacity
446 - 514 L
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,880 mm
Width
1,776 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
515 - 610 kg
Payload
490 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
185 - 309 HP
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
136 - 227 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
2,487 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Jeep
Is the Toyota RAV4 offered with different drivetrains?

The Toyota RAV4 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.