VS

Volvo EC40 vs Kia Niro comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 138 HP), boot space and price (46,500 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EC40 or Kia Niro?

Volvo EC40 vs Kia Niro: Key differences

Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Kia Niro

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EC40

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia Niro is clearly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Volvo EC40 costs 46,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,400 £.

Niro

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers considerably more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 304 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EC40 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 6.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers significantly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 405 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Niro is substantially lighter – 1,474 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 591 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Kia Niro offers slightly more boot space – 451 L compared to 404 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.

When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries marginally more – 466 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EC40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,500
EC40

Volvo EC40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 486 - 585 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Kia Niro
VS
The Kia EV3 arrives like a tech-savvy upstart — all-electric, sharp to drive and crammed with the latest infotainment and safety kit, ideal if you want a compact crossover that feels like the future. The Niro, meanwhile, stays the sensible all‑rounder: proven, roomy and available as a hybrid, …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo C40 and Volvo XC40 are closely related compact Volvos that deliver strong safety, premium interiors and modern tech, but they take different routes: the C40 is a coupe‑styled, electric‑first model focused on design and emission‑free driving, while the XC40 is a more conventional SUV …
Volvo EC40
Kia Niro

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EC40

The Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.

details
310887_Volvo_C40_Recharge_Pure_Electric

Reviews Volvo EC40

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Kia Niro

The Kia Niro is a practical crossover that blends economy and everyday versatility without sacrificing comfort. With a roomy, well-laid-out cabin and calm, composed handling, it’s an easy-to-live-with choice for commuters and families.

details
Kia_Niro_HEV_08
Kia_Niro_HEV_24
Kia_Niro_HEV_22
Kia_Niro_HEV_05
Kia_Niro_HEV_13

Reviews Kia Niro

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Archi
25 Mar 2026, 13:11:41

Efficient, functional, understated, spacious and comfortable. No surprises: it delivers what it promises and does its job without fanfare. Good buy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Wolfgang Schäfer
21 Oct 2025, 14:01:32

I've been driving the Kia Niro since 2019 and am still very happy with this car.

Frequently compared as well

Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
It's the compact-crossover face-off that asks whether you crave wallet-friendly efficiency or a bit more personality: the Kia Niro goes toe-to-toe with the Kia XCeed. One is all about hybrid thrift and everyday practicality; the other flirts with sharper styling and a livelier drive — both sensible …
Kia Niro
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Kia Niro and the Nissan Qashqai occupy similar compact crossover territory but take different approaches: the Niro emphasizes efficiency and clever interior packaging, while the Qashqai leans toward a more conventional SUV feel with sharper road manners. This short comparison outlines the key …
Kia Niro
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Kia Niro feels like the sensible crossover hero — roomy, composed and blessed with a polished hybrid system that trims fuel bills without stripping comfort. The Toyota Yaris Cross is smaller and cheekier, nailing city agility and frugal running costs, so pick the Niro for family practicality …
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
VS
Choosing between the Kia Niro and the Toyota C-HR comes down to whether you prioritize efficiency and practicality or bold styling and a sportier ride. This quick comparison highlights the Niro’s roomy, fuel-efficient approach versus the C-HR’s striking design and agile feel to help you pick the …
Kia Niro
Kia EV2
VS
Kia Niro and Kia EV2 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Niro or the Kia EV2 is the …
Volvo EC40
Volvo EX40
VS
Deciding between the Volvo C40 (commonly called the C40 Recharge) and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you prefer a coupé‑style compact electric with sharper styling or a more conventional compact electric SUV focused on practicality. This quick comparison will run through range, interior …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 pit a compact, city-focused electric with lively handling against a larger, comfort-oriented electric aimed at family use. This comparison highlights key differences in range, interior space, driving feel and tech to help you choose which suits your needs.
Hyundai Kona
Kia Niro
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers deciding between sportier looks and practical efficiency. Though they share similar underpinnings and offer hybrid and electric options, they differ in driving dynamics, interior space, and feature priorities — …
Volvo EC40
Kia Niro

Costs and Consumption
Price
46,500 - 56,800 £
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
102 - 111 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
Curb weight
1,474 kg
Trunk capacity
404 L
Trunk capacity
451 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,873 mm
Width
1,825 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 435 kg
Payload
466 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
138 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
102 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Kia
Is the Volvo EC40 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.