Compare performance (428 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (33,000 £ vs 44,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX30 or Mercedes EQA?
The electric vehicle market continues to capture attention as more automakers unveil their innovative offerings. Among the new entrants are the Mercedes EQA and the Volvo EX30—two SUVs that promise a blend of performance, luxury, and sustainability. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of these two stunning vehicles, focusing on their technical specifications and the innovations they bring to the table.
The Mercedes EQA presents a sleek and modern silhouette typical of the brand’s luxurious aesthetic. Measuring 4463 mm in length, 1834 mm in width, and 1612 mm in height, it continues the BMW tradition of understated elegance. The EQA also flaunts a spacious trunk capacity of 340 liters, providing ample room for both luggage and everyday items.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 is the compact powerhouse of the two, measuring 4233 mm in length, 1837 mm in width, and a lower height of 1549 mm. Though smaller in dimensions, this height gives the EX30 a sporty yet sturdy presence on the road. The cargo space in the EX30 is slightly less at 318 liters, but it makes up for it with a sporty design and impressive performance metrics.
Both models are designed as fully electric vehicles, highlighting the shift towards sustainable driving solutions. The EQA offers a range of power outputs—from 190 HP to an impressive 292 HP—along with front-wheel and all-wheel-drive options. It also boasts remarkable acceleration capabilities, with the fastest variant reaching 0-100 km/h in just 6 seconds. The EQA uses a battery capacity ranging from 66.5 kWh to 70.5 kWh, providing an electric range of up to 561 km, depending on the configuration.
In contrast, the Volvo EX30 is a more powerful competitor. With the ability to generate up to 428 HP, it features rear-wheel and all-wheel-drive options as well. The EX30 accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a staggering 3.6 seconds for the performance version. Its battery capacity ranges from 49 kWh to 65 kWh, offering an electric range from 339 km to 476 km. While it has a marginally higher consumption of up to 17.5 kWh/100 km, the exceptional performance may justify the slight decrease in energy efficiency.
Inside the EQA, you're met with Mercedes-Benz's signature luxury. The cabin is fitted with state-of-the-art technology, making drives more engaging and luxurious. Features like MBUX infotainment, a large digital cockpit, and comprehensive driver assistance systems elevate the driving experience. Comfort is further enhanced with a spacious five-seat layout that prioritizes passenger enjoyment.
The Volvo EX30 presents its own suite of cutting-edge technology, including an intuitive infotainment system that minimizes distractions and maximizes ease of use. The interior is designed with sustainability in mind, utilizing recycled materials that don't compromise on style. Though smaller, it comfortably accommodates five passengers, ensuring that comfort remains a priority.
Both vehicles echo their manufacturers' commitments to safety and innovation. The Mercedes EQA comes with advanced safety features ranging from active brake assistance to adaptive cruise control, earning top safety ratings in numerous tests. The inclusion of climate control offers additional convenience for all occupants.
Volvo, known for its safety standards, implements a range of features designed to protect passengers and pedestrians alike. The EX30 includes intelligent safety systems that help in accident avoidance and injury reduction. Additionally, both vehicles achieve a CO2 efficiency class of A, reinforcing their eco-friendly credentials.
In the head-to-head comparison of the Mercedes EQA and Volvo EX30, it becomes clear that both vehicles excel in different aspects. The EQA shines with its luxurious aesthetics and long electric range, while the EX30 takes the edge in raw performance and innovative design solutions. Ultimately, the choice between these two remarkable SUVs will come down to individual preferences regarding aesthetics, performance, and brand loyalty. As electric vehicles continue to evolve, the competition will undoubtedly intensify, pushing the boundaries of technology and consumer experience.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo EX30 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 33,000 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 44,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,246 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQA is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.4 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX30. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers a bit more range – reaching up to 561 km, about 85 km more than the Volvo EX30.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers noticeably more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 6 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Volvo EX30 is slightly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers barely more torque with 543 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 23 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX30 is a bit lighter – 1,840 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 205 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQA offers barely more boot space – 340 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQA offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,320 L, about 320 L more than the Volvo EX30.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQA carries very slightly more – 425 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
The Volvo EX30 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.
details
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,000 - 49,100 £
|
Price
44,200 - 57,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
|
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,115 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
318 L
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
|
Length
4,233 mm
|
Length
4,463 mm
|
|
Width
1,838 mm
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
|
Height
1,550 mm
|
Height
1,608 - 1,613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,000 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,320 L
|
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España