Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo EX30?
In today's competitive SUV market, the Ford Puma and Volvo EX30 are carving their niches by merging innovation and distinctiveness. Both offer a modern driving experience, but their approaches couldn't be more different. Let's dive into a detailed comparison of these two intriguing models to see what sets them apart.
The Ford Puma and Volvo EX30 embrace the contemporary SUV aesthetic, each with a unique twist. The Puma rides on a slightly shorter length ranging from 4186 mm to 4226 mm, compared to the EX30's 4233 mm. Both, however, maintain a compact width, with the Puma at 1805 mm and the EX30 at 1837 mm. The height difference is negligible, with the Puma standing at 1550 mm to 1555 mm and the EX30 ranging from 1549 mm to 1567 mm. Despite their compact footprints, both allow for a roomy interior with five doors and a seating capacity for five passengers.
The Ford Puma offers versatility with its combination of Petrol MHEV and Electric powertrains. It presents a range of power outputs from 125 HP to 168 HP, paired with either a manual or dual-clutch automatic transmission. Driving enthusiasts can enjoy a range of acceleration speeds—from 7.4 seconds to 9.8 seconds for 0-100 km/h—and a maximum speed of up to 210 km/h.
In contrast, the Volvo EX30 focuses solely on electric propulsion, offering formidable power with its two choices: a 272 HP or a thrilling 428 HP setup. Its acceleration truly shines, going from 0 to 100 km/h in a mere 3.6 to 5.7 seconds, though its top speed is capped at 180 km/h. The EX30 is available with rear-wheel and all-wheel drive systems, enhancing its versatility on various terrains.
Fuel efficiency is a strong suit for the Ford Puma's petrol engines, boasting consumption rates between 5.4 L/100km and 6 L/100km. Its electric variant offers a consumption of 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km, granting a respectable electric range of up to 376 km.
On the electric frontier, the Volvo EX30 offers battery capacities of 49 kWh and 65 kWh. With consumption ranging from 17 kWh/100km to 18.7 kWh/100km, it provides an impressive range of up to 476 km, making it an excellent choice for longer journeys on electric power alone.
Interior space is vital for family-oriented SUVs. The Ford Puma excels with a trunk capacity of 456 L to 523 L, accommodating various lifestyle needs. Meanwhile, the Volvo EX30, though smaller with 318 L of trunk space, promises high-quality materials and cutting-edge technology inside the cabin, living up to Volvo's legacy of luxury.
The Ford Puma boasts a variety of tech-savvy features, including an array of driver assistance systems and a refined infotainment setup. On the environmental front, its MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) system enriches its efficiency.
Volvo's EX30 takes innovation a notch higher with its all-electric architecture and advanced safety systems, part of Volvo's esteemed IntelliSafe technology suite. A particular highlight is its emphasis on eco-friendly materials and sustainable design, aligning with the brand's commitment to a greener future.
Both the Ford Puma and Volvo EX30 cater to the modern SUV enthusiast's spirit, yet point towards different directions. The Puma stands out with its diversity in powertrains and impressive interior space, perfect for those valuing versatility. Meanwhile, the EX30 represents a bold leap into the future with its electrifying performance and sustainable innovations, ideal for tech-savvy and eco-conscious drivers.
In the end, whether you lean towards Puma's hybrid versatility or the all-electric charisma of the EX30, both models promise a remarkable journey through the contemporary automotive landscape.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Volvo EX30 costs 33000 £. That’s a price difference of around 8220 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Volvo EX30 with 17 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.90 kWh.
As for range, the Volvo EX30 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 476 km, about 100 km more than the Ford Puma.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 has a significantly edge – offering 428 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 260 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.60 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slightly better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo EX30 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX30 pulls decisively stronger with 543 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 253 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1840 kg. The difference is around 524 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 205 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs noticeable better – up to 1283 L, which is about 283 L more than the Volvo EX30.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma a bit takes the win – 469 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.
The Volvo EX30 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo EX30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Volvo Cars
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
33000 - 49100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1840 - 1960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
318 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4233 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1838 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1550 - 1567 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1000 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España