VS

Volvo EX90 vs Peugeot 2008 comparison

Compare performance (680 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (72,200 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX90 or Peugeot 2008?

Volvo EX90 vs Peugeot 2008: Key differences

Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • noticeably more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Peugeot 2008

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX90

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Peugeot 2008 is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 47,400 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 2008 is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.3 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX90. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 215 km more than the Peugeot 2008.

2008

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 524 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 600 Nm more.

EX90

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is considerably lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 1,292 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries noticeably more – 605 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 158 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 570 - 620 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX90
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo EX60 are Volvo's all-electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the EX90 is the flagship full-size model focused on maximum space, safety and cutting-edge tech, while the EX60 is a mid-size alternative that prioritizes efficiency, agility and value. This comparison cuts …
Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
Volvo EX90
Peugeot 2008

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
305698_Volvo_EX90
305699_Volvo_EX90
305702_Volvo_EX90
305707_Volvo_EX90
305714_Volvo_EX90
305743_Volvo_EX90

Reviews Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
CHD
22 Apr 2026, 11:15:18

Full of faults — at least every other day there's something that needs to be fixed. Consumption 24 kWh/100 km in summer; in winter the range is half of what was promised. The safety would be good if the promised features actually worked.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.

details
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_021_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_026_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906PC_121_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_300_0

Reviews Peugeot 2008

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Prosper
26 Jun 2026, 17:36:12

This review applies to the GT version; cheap glossy plastics in the interior, lack of physical, dedicated climate/vent controls, narrow trunk width. On the plus side, excellent suspension that soaks up all the bumps, especially on gravel roads.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 3008
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 3008 boils down to whether you want a compact, city-friendly crossover or a more spacious, comfort-focused family SUV. The 2008 is nimbler and cheaper to run, while the 3008 delivers greater interior space, refinement and a broader range of stronger …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 308
VS
Deciding between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 308 comes down to lifestyle: the 2008 is a compact crossover that prioritises higher ride height, practicality and urban versatility, while the 308 is a sharper compact hatchback focused on driving dynamics and efficiency. If you need space, …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Peugeot 2008
VS
Putting the Alfa Romeo Junior against the Peugeot 2008 highlights a clash of eras: the Junior’s vintage Italian character and driver-focused feel versus the 2008’s modern, practical crossover sensibility. Choose the Junior when you want style, engagement and period charm; choose the 2008 for space, …
Citroen C4
Peugeot 2008
VS
Comparing the Citroën C4 and the Peugeot 2008 helps you decide whether you prefer the C4’s comfort-focused hatchback character or the 2008’s taller, more practical crossover stance. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, ride, efficiency and features so you can pick the one that best matches …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 408
VS
Choosing between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 408 means weighing a compact SUV’s higher ride height and urban versatility against a sleek, fastback-style family car that prioritises rear-seat space and highway composure. The 2008 suits buyers wanting agile city driving and practicality, while …
Fiat 600
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Fiat 600 and the Peugeot 2008 take very different approaches to the small-car market: the 600 is a compact, city‑focused hatch while the 2008 is a taller, more versatile subcompact crossover. I’ll compare their space, driving feel, efficiency and running costs to help you decide which suits …
MG ZS
Peugeot 2008
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Peugeot 2008 helps you weigh a value-focused, roomy compact SUV against a more stylish, composed rival with sharper handling and premium touches. This short guide highlights differences in space, equipment, driving feel and running costs so you can pick the one that …
Volvo EX90
Peugeot 2008

Costs and Consumption
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Electric Range
405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
6 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
434 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,964 mm
Width
1,770 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
545 - 605 kg
Payload
407 - 447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Peugeot
Is the Volvo EX90 offered with different drivetrains?

The Volvo EX90 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.