VS

Volvo XC60 vs SsangYong Rexton comparison

Compare performance (406 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (58,300 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or SsangYong Rexton?

Volvo XC60 vs SsangYong Rexton: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

SsangYong Rexton is significantly cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 6.6 L/100km.

Rexton

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers substantially more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 204 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 5.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers markedly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 228 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Rexton is barely lighter – 2,145 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries noticeably more – 770 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 260 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo XC60
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi

Reviews SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Frank Williams CPA/ ACCA/ CPD
22 Jan 2026, 01:20:01

Ssang Yong Rexton is better than the Land Cruiser

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
BMW X1
Volvo XC60
VS
Deciding between the BMW X1 and the Volvo XC60 is essentially a choice between a sportier, more driver-focused compact SUV and a roomier, comfort-and-safety-oriented mid‑size contender. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving dynamics, fuel economy and running costs to help you pick the …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai and the Volvo XC60 pits a practical, value-focused compact crossover against a more premium, comfort- and safety-oriented compact SUV. If you prioritize everyday efficiency and sensible running costs the Qashqai is a smart, budget-friendly choice, while the XC60 suits …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
The Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 are two of the top contenders in the compact luxury SUV class, each bringing a distinct take on comfort, technology and driving dynamics. If you prioritize sporty refinement and a plush, tech-forward cabin the GLC is a strong choice; if you value Scandinavian design, …
Volvo XC60
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 g/km
co2
214 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
-
Length
4,850 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,960 mm
Height
-
Height
1,825 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
Payload
510 kg
Payload
655 - 770 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
184 km/h
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Power kW
148 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Volvo
Brand
SsangYong
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.