Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Volvo XC90 vs Ford Tourneo Connect comparison
Compare performance (406 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (74,300 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC90 or Ford Tourneo Connect?
Volvo XC90 vs Ford Tourneo Connect: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
XC90
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Tourneo Connect is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 46,963 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers substantially more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 50 km more than the Volvo XC90.
Tourneo Connect
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers considerably more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 256 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers considerably more torque with 669 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 319 Nm more.
XC90
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 538 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries somewhat more – 818 kg compared to 710 kg. That’s a difference of about 108 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Volvo XC90
Ford Tourneo Connect
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Volvo XC90
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Volvo XC90
Ford Tourneo Connect
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
71 - 188 g/km
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
600 - 710 kg
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.