Compare performance (406 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (74,300 £ vs 51,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC90 or XPeng G9?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the luxury SUV segment, two standout contenders—the Volvo XC90 and the XPeng G9—offer a fascinating blend of tradition and innovation. As they both compete for the top spot in 2024, we delve into their technical aspects and innovations to discern what each vehicle brings to the table.
The Volvo XC90 caters to diverse preferences with its two engine options: a petrol mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) and a plug-in hybrid. With power outputs ranging from 250 HP for the MHEV to a robust 455 HP for the plug-in hybrid, it offers versatility and potent performance. The plug-in hybrid, in particular, boasts an impressive acceleration time of 5.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, rivaled by a top speed of 180 km/h.
In contrast, the XPeng G9 is purely electric, setting a new standard for green driving. With power outputs of up to 551 HP and a remarkable acceleration of just 3.9 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, it promises thrilling performance. The G9 also achieves a greater top speed of 200 km/h, underscoring its dynamic character.
The XC90 plug-in hybrid provides an electric range of 71 km and a battery capacity of 14.7 kWh, making it suitable for short-distance urban commutes without emissions. Its fuel consumption is efficient at 1.2 L/100km, ensuring that drivers enjoy both power and economy.
The XPeng G9 shines with its impressive electric range of up to 570 km on a full charge, thanks to its battery capacity options of 75.8 and 93.1 kWh. Coupled with a CO2 efficiency class of 'A', it offers zero-emission brilliance and low running costs.
Volvo prioritizes luxury and practicality with the XC90, offering seating for seven passengers, which is ideal for larger families. The SUV combines a minimalist Scandinavian design with state-of-the-art technology, providing functionality and aesthetics in equal measure.
The XPeng G9, with seating for five, focuses on high-tech comfort, featuring a spacious interior enhanced by cutting-edge infotainment systems aimed at tech-savvy users. Its innovation extends to advanced driver-assist systems aimed at providing a futuristic driving experience.
The Volvo XC90 is slightly longer at 4953 mm, compared to the XPeng G9's 4891 mm. While Volvo offers a rear trunk capacity between 262 to 302 liters, making it suitable for regular family use, the G9 excels with substantial cargo space of 660 liters, ideal for road trips or transporting larger items.
The XC90 offers different CO2 efficiency classes ranging from 'G' to 'B', aligning with its dual engine types. In terms of emissions, the plug-in hybrid option significantly reduces the carbon footprint.
The XPeng G9 sets a benchmark as an all-electric vehicle with no tailpipe emissions and a '0 g/km' CO2 figure. It emphasizes sustainability while delivering high performance and range, making it an environmentally conscious choice.
Choosing between the Volvo XC90 and XPeng G9 largely depends on your priorities. For those who treasure traditional luxury, versatility, and seating capacity, the XC90 is an admirable choice. Meanwhile, the G9 stands out for forward-thinking technology, impressive range, and a commitment to sustainability, appealing to those looking towards an electric future. Each SUV offers its unique strengths, making both vehicles compelling contenders in the luxury SUV market for 2024.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
XPeng G9 is significantly cheaper – starting at 51,100 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,220 £.
As for electric range, the XPeng G9 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 516 km more than the Volvo XC90.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 offers visibly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 169 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Volvo XC90 takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G9 delivers barely more torque with 695 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 26 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC90 is very slightly lighter – 2,080 kg compared to 2,210 kg. The difference is around 130 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries markedly more – 710 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 190 kg.
The XPeng G9 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
The XPeng G9 is a spacious, tech-forward electric SUV that pairs a calm, refined ride with responsive performance and a high-quality, minimalist cabin. With strong emphasis on connectivity and advanced driving assistance, it’s a compelling choice if you want modern EV features and generous practicality without a legacy badge.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
|
Price
51,100 - 62,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
71 - 188 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
|
Curb weight
2,210 - 2,395 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
660 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
Width
1,937 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
600 - 710 kg
|
Payload
515 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
|
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
|
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
|
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España