Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
VW ID.Polo vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (226 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW ID.Polo or Ford Puma?
VW ID.Polo vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ID.Polo
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW ID.Polo is somewhat cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,490 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is barely more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 13.3 kWh/100km for the VW ID.Polo. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the VW ID.Polo offers marginally more range – reaching up to 454 km, about 37 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.Polo offers markedly more power – delivering 226 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.Polo is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 290 Nm.
ID.Polo
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is a bit lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,568 kg. The difference is around 252 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 441 L. That’s a difference of about 82 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The VW ID.Polo is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £21,400
VW ID.Polo
VW ID.Polo
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
VW ID.Polo
The VW ID.Polo brings classic Polo sensibility to the EV age with a calm, refined ride, an unusually large boot, and refreshingly simple controls with real buttons. It favors easygoing efficiency and family-friendly practicality over playful handling or high-speed autobahn pace, and the smaller-battery versions ask for a bit more planning on long trips.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
VW ID.Polo
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 36,000 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.3 - 14.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
424 - 454 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,568 - 1,635 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
441 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,816 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
444 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 226 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
290 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 166 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.