VS

VW T-Roc vs MG Cyberster comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or MG Cyberster?

VW T-Roc vs MG Cyberster: Key differences

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

MG Cyberster

  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Roc is clearly cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,267 £.

Cyberster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers significantly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 360 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 5.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers substantially more torque with 725 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 475 Nm more.

T-Roc

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: VW T-Roc offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is visibly lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 495 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Roc offers noticeably more boot space – 284 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 84 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries clearly more – 515 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 365 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Cyberster is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,700
Cyberster

MG Cyberster

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 340 - 510 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 443 - 507 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
VW T-Roc
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW T-Roc

The VW T‑Roc feels noticeably more grown‑up than before, with a much nicer cabin, sensible physical controls and a calm, well‑insulated ride that makes long trips comfortable. It’s compact and city‑friendly with practical rear seating, but the sloping roofline reduces rear headroom and tempting options can quickly push the price up, so buyers after maximum space or a sporty feel may want to consider alternatives.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to …
Renault Captur
VW T-Roc
VS
The Renault Captur and VW T-Roc both stand out in the compact SUV segment, each offering unique strengths to cater to different audiences. The Captur boasts a stylish, urban design with customizable options and a focus on fuel efficiency, making it perfect for city dwellers. In contrast, the T-Roc …
Opel Mokka
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ongoing rivalry between Opel and Volkswagen, the Astra and Golf stand out as two of the most popular compact cars in Europe. While the Astra offers a rewarding driving experience and impressive technology at a competitive price, the Golf remains a benchmark for quality, versatility, and …
VW T-Roc
MG Cyberster

Costs and Consumption
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 143 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Trunk capacity
284 L
Trunk capacity
200 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 515 kg
Payload
150 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
VW
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the VW T-Roc?

The VW T-Roc is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.