Is the VW T-Roc offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the VW T-Roc's engine?

The VW T-Roc reaches a peak output of 150 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the VW T-Roc according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.50 L.

How fast can the VW T-Roc go?

The VW T-Roc reaches up to 212 km/h.

What is the VW T-Roc’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 475 L fit inside.

How big is the VW T-Roc overall?

The VW T-Roc measures 4271 mm long, 1811 mm wide and 1527 mm high.

Is the Polestar 2 offered with different drivetrains?

The Polestar 2 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Polestar 2's engine?

Up to 476 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much electricity does the Polestar 2 use per 100 km?

Average electricity consumption is 14.80 kWh.

What is the electric driving range of the Polestar 2?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 659 km.

How large is the Polestar 2’s battery?

The Polestar 2 comes with a 78 kWh battery.

What maximum speed does the Polestar 2 reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 205 km/h.

What is the Polestar 2’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 405 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Polestar 2?

Length 4606 mm, width 1859 mm, height 1479 mm – those are the dimensions of the Polestar 2.

VW T-Roc vs Polestar 2 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW T-Roc has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £, while the Polestar 2 costs 42000 £. That’s a price difference of around 15553 £.

2 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 2 has a decisively edge – offering 476 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 326 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 4.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs barely noticeable better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Polestar 2 tops out at 205 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 2 pulls clearly stronger with 740 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 490 Nm difference.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, VW T-Roc is distinct lighter – 1465 kg compared to 2015 kg. The difference is around 550 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers slightly more room – 475 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Roc performs somewhat better – up to 1350 L, which is about 255 L more than the Polestar 2.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc a bit takes the win – 515 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Polestar 2 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews VW T-Roc

5 (2 Reviews)

Reviews Polestar 2

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Qashqai

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …

Costs and Consumption
Price 26400 - 38000 £	Price 42000 - 57400 £
Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.8 kWh
Electric Range -	Electric Range 554 - 659 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 78 kWh
co2 126 - 143 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Sedan
Seats 4 - 5	Seats 5
Doors 2 - 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1465 - 1539 kg	Curb weight 2015 - 2188 kg
Trunk capacity 284 - 475 L	Trunk capacity 405 L
Length 4271 - 4373 mm	Length 4606 mm
Width 1811 - 1828 mm	Width 1859 mm
Height 1527 - 1573 mm	Height 1473 - 1479 mm
Max trunk capacity 1350 L	Max trunk capacity 1095 L
Payload 368 - 515 kg	Payload 375 - 421 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 150 HP	Power HP 272 - 476 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 12.3 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.2 - 6.4 s
Max Speed 187 - 212 km/h	Max Speed 205 km/h
Torque 200 - 250 Nm	Torque 490 - 740 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 85 - 110 kW	Power kW 200 - 350 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3	Engine capacity -