Compare performance (272 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (39,600 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Tayron or Volvo XC60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the highly competitive SUV market, the Volvo XC60 and VW Tayron emerge as two formidable contenders, offering a blend of style, performance, and innovation. This article delves into a detailed comparison, focusing on the technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experience of these two vehicles.
The Volvo XC60 is available with various powertrains, including petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV) and plug-in hybrid options. It comes with a range of power outputs, from a modest 250 HP to an impressive 455 HP. With its advanced all-wheel drive system, the XC60 ensures a power-packed performance, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds in its most potent configuration. Its best-in-class torque rating of 709 Nm underlines its robust performance capabilities.
On the other hand, the VW Tayron also boasts a range of engine options, including petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrids, with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to 272 HP. The Tayron is versatile, offering both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. It achieves a top acceleration figure of 7.3 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint with its more powerful versions, making it an agile player in the SUV segment.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the XC60’s mild-hybrid powertrains yield a consumption figure of around 7.7 L/100 km, while the plug-in hybrid option offers an astonishing 0.9 L/100 km under electric-only operation. The CO2 emissions also reflect this efficiency, with figures as low as 22 g/km for the hybrid variants.
In contrast, the VW Tayron showcases a commendable fuel efficiency of 6.2 L/100 km for its most efficient model, although its diesel variants and hybrids offer strong emission figures as well, with CO2 ratings between 9 to 167 g/km. The Tayron's plug-in hybrid variant stands out with an electric-only consumption of just 0.4 L/100 km, setting a competitive benchmark.
Both models excel in their electric-driving capabilities. The XC60 features a plug-in hybrid with an electric range of up to 80 km, thanks to its 14.7 kWh battery capacity. This makes it a great option for short commutes and urban driving without the need for gasoline.
Conversely, the Tayron comes equipped with a larger battery capacity of 19.7 kWh, providing an electric range of up to 126 km, making it an appealing choice for eco-conscious drivers looking for extended electric mobility. Its larger battery not only establishes its superiority in this segment but also enhances its overall versatility.
Inside the XC60, a strong emphasis is placed on premium materials and craftsmanship, resulting in a luxurious cabin that exudes comfort and style. The infotainment system is intuitive, featuring a large touchscreen interface with seamless smartphone integration capabilities.
The VW Tayron, however, counters with a spacious interior that provides versatility for both passengers and cargo. The infotainment system is equally modern, and its ergonomic layout facilitiates easy access to controls while driving. Both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, but the Tayron has a notable advantage in trunk capacity, boasting up to 885 liters compared to XC60's 483 liters, providing ample space for family adventures.
Safety is a hallmark of the Volvo brand, and the XC60 is no exception. It comes equipped with the latest suite of safety technologies, including advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), collision avoidance technologies, and lane-keeping assists, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
The VW Tayron also embraces modern safety standards, offering a range of features that include adaptive cruise control, emergency braking, and a host of other smart safety innovations. While both vehicles set high standards in the safety realm, the XC60’s long-standing reputation in this area gives it a slight edge.
In the battle between the Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron, both SUVs present unique strengths tailored to different preferences. The XC60 leans towards luxurious refinement and superior safety features, while the Tayron offers a robust array of engine choices and ample cargo capacity. Ultimately, your choice between these two outstanding vehicles will hinge on personal priorities, such as performance, efficiency, and the overall driving experience you seek. Regardless of your decision, both models are commendable options in the crowded SUV market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW Tayron is noticeably cheaper – starting at 39,600 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,579 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Tayron uses 1.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the VW Tayron offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 123 km, about 41 km more than the Volvo XC60.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers substantially more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 183 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the VW Tayron takes 6.1 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the VW Tayron is a bit faster – reaching 221 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 41 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers substantially more torque with 709 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 309 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW Tayron is a bit lighter – 1,682 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 218 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Tayron offers considerably more boot space – 885 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 402 L.
For maximum load capacity, the VW Tayron offers visibly more capacity – up to 2,090 L, about 547 L more than the Volvo XC60.
When it comes to payload, the VW Tayron carries very slightly more – 566 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
The VW Tayron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW Tayron is Volkswagen's roomy, no-nonsense SUV that pairs clean, familiar styling with a practical cabin built for families and everyday use. It rides comfortably, packs sensible tech and creature comforts, and feels like the sensible sweater of SUVs for buyers who prefer steady value over headline-grabbing drama.
details
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,600 - 56,000 £
|
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 123 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
33 - 192 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,682 - 1,948 kg
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
4,792 mm
|
Length
4,708 mm
|
|
Width
1,853 - 1,866 mm
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
1,666 - 1,668 mm
|
Height
1,655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,915 - 2,090 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
|
|
Payload
489 - 566 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
204 - 221 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España