VS

XPeng G9 vs KGM Musso EV comparison

Compare performance (575 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (51,100 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – XPeng G9 or KGM Musso EV?

XPeng G9 vs KGM Musso EV: Key differences

XPeng G9

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

KGM Musso EV

  • significantly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

G9

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

KGM Musso EV is significantly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the XPeng G9 costs 51,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,094 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the XPeng G9 is visibly more efficient: consuming 18.4 kWh/100km compared to 23 kWh/100km for the KGM Musso EV. That’s a difference of about 4.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng G9 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 165 km more than the KGM Musso EV.

Musso EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 offers visibly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 414 HP. That’s roughly 161 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the KGM Musso EV takes 8 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G9 delivers barely more torque with 695 Nm compared to 678 Nm. That’s about 17 Nm more.

G9

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, KGM Musso EV is barely lighter – 2,165 kg compared to 2,210 kg. The difference is around 45 kg.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso EV carries substantially more – 905 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 385 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G9 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,100
G9

XPeng G9

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 351 - 575 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 502 - 585 km
XPeng G9
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

XPeng G9

The XPeng G9 is a spacious, tech-forward electric SUV that pairs a calm, refined ride with responsive performance and a high-quality, minimalist cabin. With strong emphasis on connectivity and advanced driving assistance, it’s a compelling choice if you want modern EV features and generous practicality without a legacy badge.

details

KGM Musso EV

The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.

details
XPeng G9
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption

Price
51,100 - 62,200 £
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,210 - 2,395 kg
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
Trunk capacity
660 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,937 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
515 - 520 kg
Payload
805 - 905 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
XPeng
Brand
KGM
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.