Ford Puma alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Ford Puma, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

scroll down

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Ford Puma and are good next research steps.

from £20,700

SEAT Arona

Price 20,700 - 30,300 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 11.1 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model Arona
Modell Arona 1.0 TSI, Arona 1.5 TSI
CO2 Efficiency Class D
Trim Level Style, Style DSG, FR, FR DSG, FR Black Edition, FR Black Edition DSG
Power kW 70 - 110 kW
co2 120 - 132 g/km
Engine capacity 999 - 1,498 cm3
Curb weight 1,188 - 1,268 kg
Trunk capacity 400 L
Width 1,780 mm
Brand SEAT
Payload 502 - 522 kg

details

SEAT Arona as a suitable alternative to Ford Puma

In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or clever space and everyday value.

The SEAT Arona is a compact crossover that blends practical, city-friendly packaging with a sporty, youthful design. It delivers a comfortable ride, an intuitive cabin and economical running costs, making it a sensible pick for daily drives and weekend getaways.

Quick data check: SEAT Arona

a bit more power
a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
visibly more trunk space
slightly cheaper
very slightly more efficient
moderately lighter

Compare directly with SEAT Arona

from £19,600

Vauxhall Corsa

Price 19,600 - 30,600 £
Body Type Hatchback
Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 100 - 156 HP
Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km 14.2 - 15.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range 357 - 429 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.9 - 9.9 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,025
Torque 205 - 260 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3
Model Corsa
Modell Corsa Electric (50 kWh), Corsa 1.2 DI Turbo Hybrid 48V, Corsa Electric (54 kWh), Corsa 1.2 DI Turbo
CO2 Efficiency Class A, C, D
Trim Level Edition, GS, Ultimate eDCT, Ultimate, YES
Power kW 74 - 115 kW
co2 0 - 116 g/km
Engine capacity 1,199 cm3
Curb weight 1,175 - 1,544 kg
Trunk capacity 267 - 309 L
Width 1,765 mm
Brand Vauxhall
Payload 376 - 445 kg
Variant Electric

details

Vauxhall Corsa as a suitable alternative to Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and a bit of weekend swagger, go Puma; if your life is mostly urban commutes and you care about running costs and easy parking, the Corsa is the smarter, wallet-friendly pick.

The Opel Corsa is a tidy little package that blends cheeky styling with sensible practicality, perfect for city streets and weekend escapes alike. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and just lively enough to make daily driving a bit more fun.

Quick data check: Vauxhall Corsa

marginally more power
marginally more efficient
very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
considerably more trunk space
markedly cheaper
markedly more efficient
barely more electric range
somewhat lighter

Compare directly with Vauxhall Corsa

from £24,000

Renault R5

Price 24,000 - 27,000 £
Body Type Hatchback
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 122 - 150 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range 307 - 405 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8 - 9 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 225 - 245 Nm
Model R5
Modell E-Tech Electric 120 Urban Range (40 kWh), E-Tech Electric 150 Comfort Range (52 kWh)
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Evolution, Techno, Iconic Five
Power kW 90 - 110 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 1,447 - 1,524 kg
Trunk capacity 326 L
Width 1,744 mm
Brand Renault
Payload 396 - 418 kg

details

Renault R5 as a suitable alternative to Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, pick the Puma; if you live in the city, love classic looks and want an efficient, characterful EV, the Renault 5 is your match.

The Renault 5 blends classic styling cues with contemporary design, giving it a playful and characterful presence on the road. It’s a city-focused hatchback that feels nimble and cleverly packaged, ideal for drivers who want personality and practicality.

Quick data check: Renault R5

barely cheaper
moderately more power
somewhat more efficient
barely more electric range
barely quicker 0–100 km/h
barely lighter
noticeably more trunk space

Compare directly with Renault R5

from £23,600

Hyundai Kona

Price 23,600 - 41,900 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 204 HP
Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range 380 - 510 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 11.9 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Model Kona
Modell Kona 1.0 T-GDI, Kona 1.6 GDI HEV, Kona 1.6 T-GDI, Kona Elektro (49 kWh), Kona Elektro (65 kWh)
CO2 Efficiency Class D, C, E, F, A
Trim Level Select, Select DCT, Trend DCT, N Line DCT, Prime DCT, N Line X DCT, Trend, N Line, Prime, N Line X Allrad DCT, N-Line, N-Line X
Power kW 85 - 150 kW
co2 0 - 163 g/km
Engine capacity 998 - 1,598 cm3
Curb weight 1,370 - 1,773 kg
Trunk capacity 466 L
Width 1,825 mm
Brand Hyundai
Payload 420 - 490 kg
Variant Elektro

details

Hyundai Kona as a suitable alternative to Ford Puma

The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich cabin comes down to whether you prioritise driving dynamics or equipment and versatility.

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

Quick data check: Hyundai Kona

slightly more efficient
very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
very slightly lighter
slightly more trunk space
marginally cheaper
moderately more power
a bit more efficient
slightly more electric range

Compare directly with Hyundai Kona

from £25,700

Mazda CX-30

Price 25,700 - 37,200 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model CX-30
Modell CX-30 2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140, CX-30 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186
CO2 Efficiency Class D, E
Trim Level Prime-Line, Prime-Line Automatik, Center-Line, Center-Line Automatik, Homura, Homura Automatik, Nagisa, Nagisa Automatik, Exclusive-Line, Exclusive-Line Automatik, Takumi, Takumi Automatik, Center-Line AWD, Center-Line AWD Automatik, Homura AWD, Homura AWD Automatik, Nagisa AWD, Nagisa AWD Automatik, Exclusive-Line AWD, Exclusive-Line AWD Automatik, Takumi AWD, Takumi AWD Automatik
Power kW 103 - 137 kW
co2 129 - 148 g/km
Engine capacity 1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Curb weight 1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L
Width 1,795 mm
Brand Mazda
Payload 458 - 496 kg

details

Mazda CX-30 as a suitable alternative to Ford Puma

In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; pick the CX-30 if you want a quieter, classier drive and don’t mind paying a little extra for the nicer finish.

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-30

only slightly cheaper
very slightly more efficient
somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
somewhat lighter
a bit more trunk space
barely more power

Compare directly with Mazda CX-30

from £22,800

Kia EV2

Price 22,800 - 31,600 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 135 - 147 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range 317 - 453 km
Seats 4 - 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.7 - 9.7 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 250 Nm
Model EV2
Modell (42,2 kWh), (61 kWh)
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Light, Air, Earth, GT-Line
Power kW 100 - 108 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 1,620 - 1,625 kg
Width 1,800 mm
Brand Kia
Payload 400 - 475 kg

details

Kia EV2 as a suitable alternative to Ford Puma

The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving character and versatile powertrains matter; pick the Kia EV2 if you prioritise zero-emission running, advanced connectivity and a simpler ownership experience.

The Kia EV2 is a compact electric crossover aimed at buyers who want a practical, affordable EV with a modern, well-appointed cabin. It combines comfortable, predictable handling with straightforward tech and efficient everyday usability, making it a sensible choice for daily driving.

Quick data check: Kia EV2

moderately more power
moderately more efficient
slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
noticeably lighter
very slightly cheaper
barely more electric range

Compare directly with Kia EV2

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Ford Puma head-to-head against similar models.

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.