Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 19900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW Taigo?
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and VW Taigo are vying for the attention of car enthusiasts and practical buyers alike. Both models bring their distinctive flair and cutting-edge innovations to the table, making the choice between them a fascinating pursuit. Let's dive into the technical details and innovations that set these vehicles apart.
The Ford Puma offers an impressive range of powertrains, featuring both petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicles (MHEV) and all-electric options. With power outputs ranging from 125 HP to 168 HP, the Puma provides a compelling blend of efficiency and performance. The mild-hybrid option stands out with a consumption rate as low as 5.4 L/100km, and the all-electric variant boasts a range of up to 376 km on a single charge.
Meanwhile, the VW Taigo focuses solely on petrol engines with power outputs from 95 HP to 150 HP. Although it lacks electric variants, the Taigo compensates with a smooth driving experience, and a combined efficiency of around 5.4 L/100km, making it an economically viable choice for stretch-long journeys.
Speed enthusiasts will appreciate the Puma's top speed offerings, maxing out at an impressive 210 km/h for the more powerful variant, while its acceleration capabilities can push it from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.4 seconds. On the other hand, the Taigo maintains a respectable performance, reaching top speeds of up to 212 km/h and moderate accelerations of 8.2 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.
Both models share a front-wheel-drive system, ensuring adept handling and maneuverability in urban environments. The Puma aligns with a higher curb weight due to its hybrid and electric configurations, whereas the Taigo offers lighter alternatives for enhanced agility.
When it comes to size, the Ford Puma measures slightly smaller with a width of 1805 mm and an overall length starting at 4186 mm, providing it with a more compact footprint ideal for city driving. The height of 1550 mm complements its SUV stance, while a trunk capacity of up to 523 L ensures enough space for convenience.
The VW Taigo stretches out to a length of 4266 mm, granting it a sleek silhouette, coupled with a narrower width of 1757 mm, which may aid in squeezing through tighter urban lanes. Its trunk space is ample at 440 L, sufficient for day-to-day cargo needs.
In terms of innovations, the Ford Puma leverages its mild-hybrid technology to increase fuel efficiency and reduce emissions, attaining a CO2 rating as low as 0 g/km in its electric variant, aligning with modern eco-conscious automotive trends.
Conversely, the Taigo emphasizes solid engineering with a steadfast focus on traditional petrol efficiency, achieving moderate CO2 outputs around 124-132 g/km. While it doesn't break ground in hybrid technology, its dedication to performance consistency makes it a reliable option for many drivers.
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the VW Taigo boils down to your driving priorities. The Puma excels with a multifaceted powertrain offering including electric variants for the eco-conscious driver. Meanwhile, the Taigo's sturdy petrol engine lineup appeals to those seeking straightforward reliability and efficiency.
Both models stand as excellent choices in the compact SUV category, each presenting unique strengths that cater to a diverse set of preferences among automotive enthusiasts. Consider your driving needs and aspirations when selecting your ideal companion for the road ahead.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW Taigo has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 19900 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4851 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Taigo manages with 5.30 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a slightly edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the VW Taigo takes 8.20 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW Taigo is minimal lighter – 1229 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 87 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slight more room – 456 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 16 L.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The VW Taigo brings coupe-like flair to the compact crossover scene with sharp styling and an interior that punches above its price, feeling smarter than you’d expect. It’s an easygoing daily companion that balances comfort and practicality with a playful wink, perfect for city drivers who want something livelier than a regular hatchback.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
19900 - 31800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
120 - 132 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1229 - 1302 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 L
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1757 mm
|
|
Height
1550 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
448 - 457 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 11.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España