Mazda CX-80 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-80, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mazda CX-80

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-80 and are good next research steps.

from £74,300
XC90

Volvo XC90

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 250 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 69 km
details

Volvo XC90 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you want sharper steering, attractive value and a bit of character; pick the Volvo if you need maximum space, premium refinement and the reassurance of class-leading safety (for a price that reminds you it’s the nicer sofa).

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

Quick data check: Volvo XC90

  • considerably cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
Compare directly with Volvo XC90
from £40,200
Tayron

VW Tayron

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range 116 - 123 km
details

VW Tayron as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, technology package and value, helping you choose the better fit for your needs.

The VW Tayron combines a roomy, practical interior with a composed, comfortable ride that suits both daily commuting and longer journeys. With a restrained, modern design and a focus on straightforward tech and safety, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want Volkswagen refinement without unnecessary flash.

Quick data check: VW Tayron

  • slightly more power
  • visibly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
Compare directly with VW Tayron
from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Mazda CX-60 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritize sportier, more refined handling and a compact footprint (CX-60) or passenger capacity and versatility with similar Mazda styling and quality (CX-80).

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-60

  • slightly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
Compare directly with Mazda CX-60
from £38,600
MGS9

MG MGS9

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 299 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.4 L/100km
  • Electric Range 100 km
details

Quick data check: MG MGS9

  • only slightly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • markedly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • clearly more trunk space
Compare directly with MG MGS9
from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
details

Skoda Kodiaq as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and functionality. While the CX-80 highlights Mazda's commitment to driving pleasure, the Kodiaq shines as a dependable all-rounder tailored to meet everyday needs.

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

Quick data check: Skoda Kodiaq

  • somewhat more power
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
Compare directly with Skoda Kodiaq
from £63,300
RX

Lexus RX

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 207 - 371 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.3 - 8.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 67 km
details

Lexus RX as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish design with exceptional versatility, making it an appealing choice for families seeking both comfort and functionality on the road.

The Lexus RX glides through city streets with the kind of hushed refinement that turns mundane commutes into a private lounge. It mixes plush comfort and polished practicality in a package that suits buyers who want to arrive relaxed and a touch smug.

Quick data check: Lexus RX

  • noticeably cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
Compare directly with Lexus RX

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-80 head-to-head against similar models.

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.