Mazda CX-80 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-80, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mazda CX-80

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-80 and are good next research steps.

from £74,300
XC90

Volvo XC90

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 250 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 69 km
details

Volvo XC90 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you want sharper steering, attractive value and a bit of character; pick the Volvo if you need maximum space, premium refinement and the reassurance of class-leading safety (for a price that reminds you it’s the nicer sofa).

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

Quick data check: Volvo XC90

  • considerably cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
Compare directly with Volvo XC90
from £40,200
Tayron

VW Tayron

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range 116 - 123 km
details

VW Tayron as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, technology package and value, helping you choose the better fit for your needs.

The VW Tayron combines a roomy, practical interior with a composed, comfortable ride that suits both daily commuting and longer journeys. With a restrained, modern design and a focus on straightforward tech and safety, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want Volkswagen refinement without unnecessary flash.

Quick data check: VW Tayron

  • slightly more power
  • visibly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
Compare directly with VW Tayron
from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Mazda CX-60 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritize sportier, more refined handling and a compact footprint (CX-60) or passenger capacity and versatility with similar Mazda styling and quality (CX-80).

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-60

  • slightly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
Compare directly with Mazda CX-60
from £38,600
MGS9

MG MGS9

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 299 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.4 L/100km
  • Electric Range 100 km
details

Quick data check: MG MGS9

  • only slightly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • markedly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • clearly more trunk space
Compare directly with MG MGS9
from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.5 L/100km
details

Quick data check: Mazda CX-5

  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
Compare directly with Mazda CX-5
from £39,300
5008

Peugeot 5008

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 145 - 325 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.7 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 18.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 78 - 669 km
details

Peugeot 5008 as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-80

In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, making it an ideal choice for family-oriented buyers seeking comfort and convenience.

The Peugeot 5008 blends Peugeot's sharp design with the space and versatility families actually need, wrapping clever packaging and a premium-feeling cabin in a crisp, SUV-like silhouette. It drives with more poise than you'd expect from a people carrier, serves up practical touches and flexible seating for everyday chaos, and still looks good when parked outside the school gates.

Quick data check: Peugeot 5008

  • only slightly more power
  • noticeably cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
Compare directly with Peugeot 5008

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-80 head-to-head against similar models.

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.