Volvo EC40 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Volvo EC40, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Volvo EC40 and are good next research steps.

from £45,200

Volvo EX40

Price 45,200 - 56,000 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 238 - 442 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range 477 - 576 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.6 - 7.3 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,026
Torque 420 - 670 Nm
Model EX40
Model Single Motor Extended Range, Twin Motor Performance, Twin Motor, Single Motor
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Ultra Black Edition, Ultra Black Edition AWD, Plus Black Edition AWD, Plus, Ultra, Plus AWD, Ultra AWD
Power kW 175 - 325 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,040 - 2,170 kg
Trunk capacity 410 L
Width 1,863 mm
Brand Volvo
Payload 430 - 480 kg

details

Volvo EX40 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EC40

Deciding between the Volvo C40 (commonly called the C40 Recharge) and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you prefer a coupé‑style compact electric with sharper styling or a more conventional compact electric SUV focused on practicality. This quick comparison will run through range, interior space, tech, driving feel and value to help you choose the Volvo that fits your needs.

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

Quick data check: Volvo EX40

very slightly cheaper
marginally lighter
barely more trunk space

Compare directly with Volvo EX40

from £43,700

BMW iX2

Price 43,700 - 55,600 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 204 - 313 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 14.4 - 15.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range 476 - 512 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.6 - 8.6 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 250 - 494 Nm
Model iX2
Model iX2 eDrive20, iX2 xDrive30
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level M Sportpaket, M Sportpaket Pro
Power kW 150 - 230 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 1,960 - 2,095 kg
Trunk capacity 525 L
Width 1,845 mm
Brand BMW
Payload 500 - 510 kg

details

BMW iX2 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EC40

The BMW iX2 and Volvo EC40 are rival compact electric crossovers aimed at buyers who want sporty driving and premium design in a small EV package. This comparison looks at range, performance, interior quality, tech, practicality and ownership to help you decide which best fits your priorities.

The BMW iX2 cuts a sporty silhouette and delivers the buttoned-up premium feel you expect from the brand, wrapped in a compact electric package that’s easy to live with. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want engaging city driving, clever cabin tech and a touch of eco-conscious flair without giving up the fun behind the wheel.

Quick data check: BMW iX2

only slightly cheaper
somewhat more efficient
only slightly lighter
clearly more trunk space

Compare directly with BMW iX2

from £54,000

Volvo EX60

Price 54,000 - 67,500 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 374 - 680 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range 611 - 810 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.9 - 5.9 s
Model Year 2,026 - 2,027
Torque 480 - 790 Nm
Model EX60
Model P6 Electric, P10 Electric, P12 Electric
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Plus, Ultra, Plus AWD, Ultra AWD, Plus First Edition AWD, Ultra First Edition AWD
Power kW 275 - 500 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,189 - 2,405 kg
Trunk capacity 523 L
Width 1,899 mm
Brand Volvo
Payload 455 - 461 kg
Variant Cross Country

details

Quick data check: Volvo EX60

clearly more power
only slightly more efficient
markedly more electric range
somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
clearly more trunk space

Compare directly with Volvo EX60

from £32,000

Skoda Elroq

Price 32,000 - 47,000 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 190 - 340 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range 441 - 574 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 8.5 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 350 - 679 Nm
Model Elroq
Model Elroq 60, Elroq 85, Elroq 85x, Elroq RS
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Essence, Selection, Sportline
Power kW 140 - 250 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,036 - 2,255 kg
Trunk capacity 470 L
Width 1,884 mm
Brand Skoda
Payload 482 - 549 kg
Variant RS

details

Skoda Elroq as a suitable alternative to Volvo EC40

In the latest comparison of the Volvo EC40 and Skoda Elroq, both vehicles showcase impressive electric capabilities and distinctive styling that cater to modern drivers. The EC40 stands out with its minimalist interior and advanced safety features, while the Elroq offers a balance of practicality and performance with its spacious cabin and agile handling. Ultimately, choosing between these two electric crossovers will depend on individual preferences for design, technology, and driving dynamics.

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

Quick data check: Skoda Elroq

clearly cheaper
very slightly more efficient
barely lighter
moderately more trunk space

Compare directly with Skoda Elroq

from £41,900

Volvo XC40

Price 41,900 - 46,100 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 163 - 197 HP
Consumption L/100km 6.5 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model XC40
Model B3, B4
CO2 Efficiency Class E
Trim Level Plus DKG, Ultra DKG
Power kW 120 - 145 kW
co2 148 g/km
Engine capacity 1,969 cm3
Curb weight 1,688 kg
Width 1,863 mm
Brand Volvo
Payload 532 kg

details

Volvo XC40 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EC40

The Volvo C40 and Volvo XC40 are closely related compact Volvos that deliver strong safety, premium interiors and modern tech, but they take different routes: the C40 is a coupe‑styled, electric‑first model focused on design and emission‑free driving, while the XC40 is a more conventional SUV available with electric and petrol/plug‑in options for broader practicality. This comparison will strip down the key differences—range and powertrains, interior space, driving character and value—so you can choose whether you want a stylish pure EV (C40) or the more versatile XC40.

The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.

Quick data check: Volvo XC40

a bit cheaper
markedly lighter

Compare directly with Volvo XC40

from £20,700

Citroen C4

Price 20,700 - 32,200 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 110 - 156 HP
Consumption L/100km 4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 15.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range 354 - 427 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8 - 10.8 s
Model Year 2,025 - 2,026
Torque 205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3
Model C4
Model e-C4 136, e-C4 156, e-C4 X 136, e-C4 X 156, C4 Hybrid 110, C4 Hybrid 145, C4 X Hybrid 145
CO2 Efficiency Class A, C
Trim Level You, Plus, Max, You e-DSC6, Plus e-DSC6, Max e-DSC6, Team D e-DSC6, Team D, Collection e-DSC6, Collection
Power kW 81 - 115 kW
co2 0 - 108 g/km
Engine capacity 1,199 cm3
Curb weight 1,403 - 1,652 kg
Trunk capacity 380 - 510 L
Width 1,800 - 1,834 mm
Brand Citroen
Payload 379 - 406 kg

details

Quick data check: Citroen C4

clearly cheaper
a bit more efficient
clearly lighter
noticeably more trunk space

Compare directly with Citroen C4

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Volvo EC40 head-to-head against similar models.

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.