Compare performance (158 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Suzuki Swift?
In the ever-evolving world of hatchbacks, two protagonists have caught the attention of automotive enthusiasts: the Renault Clio and the Suzuki Swift. Both of these compact marvels offer style, efficiency, and innovation, but how do they stand against each other in terms of technical aspects?
The Renault Clio and the Suzuki Swift both maintain their positions in the hatchback segment with appealing designs and compact dimensions. The Clio measures 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and 1440 mm in height, offering a sleek and modern appearance. The Swift, on the other hand, is slightly more compact at 3860 mm in length, 1735 mm in width, and with two height options of 1485 mm or 1510 mm, presenting a sporty and nimble look.
Renault gives the Clio a versatile engine lineup, including options for Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG engines. The Clio's power output ranges from 67 HP to a more robust 143 HP, catering to a diverse audience. Complementing these power figures is a range of transmissions — from a manual gearbox to a CVT, delivering either a spirited or efficient ride.
The Suzuki Swift opts for a petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) setup, with a consistent output of 82 HP. It also offers flexibility with either a manual gearbox or a CVT, enhancing its driving dynamics. Additionally, the Swift comes with both front-wheel drive and all-wheel-drive configurations, making it suitable for various terrains and driving conditions.
For the environmentally conscious, both models present attractive options. The Renault Clio showcases a range of consumption figures, with the hybrid variant achieving an impressive 4.3 L/100 km. CO2 emissions range between 97 g/km and 130 g/km, ensuring it meets various efficiency standards.
The Swift also impresses with low consumption figures, varying from 4.4 L/100 km to 4.9 L/100 km, and CO2 emissions between 98 g/km and 106 g/km. These figures reinforce its reputation as a sustainable choice for conscious drivers.
When it comes to interior space, both hatchbacks accommodate five seats. The Renault Clio edges forward with a trunk capacity of 391 L, a significant advantage over the Swift's 265 L, catering to those needing more storage for weekend getaways or daily commutes. Moreover, the Clio features a slightly higher payload capacity, peaking at 406 kg compared to the Swift's 296 kg, making it a versatile option for small families or active lifestyles.
In summary, the choice between the Renault Clio and the Suzuki Swift boils down to individual preferences and priorities. If you're looking for a hatchback that combines hybrid efficiency with ample storage space and dynamic performance, the Clio is worth considering. However, if a compact yet sporty design with advanced safety and multiple drivetrain options is your priority, the Swift stands as an excellent contender. Both models offer unique strengths, making either a compelling choice in the crowded hatchback market.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Clio is marginally cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Suzuki Swift costs 17,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 85 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Suzuki Swift with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers considerably more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 76 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Clio is marginally faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Clio delivers substantially more torque with 190 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 78 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swift is slightly lighter – 1,069 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 133 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers moderately more boot space – 327 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio offers somewhat more capacity – up to 1,176 L, about 196 L more than the Suzuki Swift.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries markedly more – 463 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 167 kg.
The Renault Clio is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
details
The Suzuki Swift is a cheeky little hatch that turns city streets into its playground with lively handling and a grin-inducing drive. Practical enough for daily chores, thrifty to run and kinder on your wallet than many rivals, it's a sensible pick for buyers who want fun without drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
|
Price
17,100 - 21,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
92 - 115 g/km
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
|
Curb weight
1,069 - 1,145 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
|
Trunk capacity
265 L
|
|
Length
4,116 mm
|
Length
3,860 mm
|
|
Width
1,768 mm
|
Width
1,735 mm
|
|
Height
1,451 mm
|
Height
1,485 - 1,510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
|
Max trunk capacity
980 L
|
|
Payload
453 - 463 kg
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
190 Nm
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,197 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España