Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Renault Clio or Suzuki Swift?
In the ever-evolving world of hatchbacks, two protagonists have caught the attention of automotive enthusiasts: the Renault Clio and the Suzuki Swift. Both of these compact marvels offer style, efficiency, and innovation, but how do they stand against each other in terms of technical aspects?
The Renault Clio and the Suzuki Swift both maintain their positions in the hatchback segment with appealing designs and compact dimensions. The Clio measures 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and 1440 mm in height, offering a sleek and modern appearance. The Swift, on the other hand, is slightly more compact at 3860 mm in length, 1735 mm in width, and with two height options of 1485 mm or 1510 mm, presenting a sporty and nimble look.
Renault gives the Clio a versatile engine lineup, including options for Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG engines. The Clio's power output ranges from 67 HP to a more robust 143 HP, catering to a diverse audience. Complementing these power figures is a range of transmissions — from a manual gearbox to a CVT, delivering either a spirited or efficient ride.
The Suzuki Swift opts for a petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) setup, with a consistent output of 82 HP. It also offers flexibility with either a manual gearbox or a CVT, enhancing its driving dynamics. Additionally, the Swift comes with both front-wheel drive and all-wheel-drive configurations, making it suitable for various terrains and driving conditions.
For the environmentally conscious, both models present attractive options. The Renault Clio showcases a range of consumption figures, with the hybrid variant achieving an impressive 4.3 L/100 km. CO2 emissions range between 97 g/km and 130 g/km, ensuring it meets various efficiency standards.
The Swift also impresses with low consumption figures, varying from 4.4 L/100 km to 4.9 L/100 km, and CO2 emissions between 98 g/km and 106 g/km. These figures reinforce its reputation as a sustainable choice for conscious drivers.
When it comes to interior space, both hatchbacks accommodate five seats. The Renault Clio edges forward with a trunk capacity of 391 L, a significant advantage over the Swift's 265 L, catering to those needing more storage for weekend getaways or daily commutes. Moreover, the Clio features a slightly higher payload capacity, peaking at 406 kg compared to the Swift's 296 kg, making it a versatile option for small families or active lifestyles.
In summary, the choice between the Renault Clio and the Suzuki Swift boils down to individual preferences and priorities. If you're looking for a hatchback that combines hybrid efficiency with ample storage space and dynamic performance, the Clio is worth considering. However, if a compact yet sporty design with advanced safety and multiple drivetrain options is your priority, the Swift stands as an excellent contender. Both models offer unique strengths, making either a compelling choice in the crowded hatchback market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Clio has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16600 £, while the Suzuki Swift costs 17100 £. That’s a price difference of around 557 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.30 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Suzuki Swift with 4.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio has a clearly edge – offering 143 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Clio performs minimal better – reaching 174 km/h, while the Suzuki Swift tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Clio pulls clearly stronger with 205 Nm compared to 112 Nm. That’s about 93 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Suzuki Swift is minimal lighter – 1069 kg compared to 1124 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Clio offers distinct more room – 391 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 126 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio performs minimal better – up to 1069 L, which is about 89 L more than the Suzuki Swift.
When it comes to payload, Renault Clio clearly perceptible takes the win – 406 kg compared to 296 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.
Overall, the Renault Clio shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Renault Group Media
The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
The Suzuki Swift is a compact hatchback that offers a spirited driving experience, making it a popular choice for city dwellers. With its sleek design and agile handling, it effortlessly navigates urban streets while providing a comfortable interior with ample space for passengers and luggage. Its economical fuel consumption and reliable performance make it a practical option for those seeking a balance between style and functionality.
details
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16600 - 23000 £
|
Price
17100 - 21200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 5.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
97 - 121 g/km
|
co2
98 - 110 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
|
Curb weight
1069 - 1145 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
Trunk capacity
265 L
|
|
Length
4053 mm
|
Length
3860 mm
|
|
Width
1798 mm
|
Width
1735 mm
|
|
Height
1440 mm
|
Height
1485 - 1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
|
Max trunk capacity
980 L
|
|
Payload
398 - 406 kg
|
Payload
282 - 296 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
67 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 17.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 174 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
|
Torque
112 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
49 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
61 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1197 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
The Renault Clio is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España