@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
VS

Abarth 500 595 695 vs Alfa Romeo Junior – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Abarth 500 595 695 or Alfa Romeo Junior?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Alfa Romeo Junior has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25700 £, while the Abarth 500 595 695 costs 32600 £. That’s a price difference of around 6891 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alfa Romeo Junior: with 15.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Abarth 500 595 695 with 17.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh.

As for range, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs evident better – achieving up to 410 km, about 145 km more than the Abarth 500 595 695.

Junior @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Junior has a decisively edge – offering 280 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 125 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Abarth 500 595 695 takes 7 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs evident better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Abarth 500 595 695 tops out at 155 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alfa Romeo Junior pulls evident stronger with 345 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm difference.

500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Alfa Romeo Junior offers a bit more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is slight lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1410 kg. The difference is around 30 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers convincingly more room – 415 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 230 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs clearly better – up to 1280 L, which is about 730 L more than the Abarth 500 595 695.

When it comes to payload, Alfa Romeo Junior barely noticeable takes the win – 420 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Alfa Romeo Junior shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,700
Junior @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Alfa Romeo Junior

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 136 - 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 5.4 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.1 - 17.5 kWh
  • Electric Range : 344 - 410 km

Abarth 500 595 695

The Abarth 500, particularly in its 595 and 695 renditions, captures the spirit of Italian motoring with its compact yet aggressive design. Known for its lively performance and distinctive styling, this little powerhouse is a joy to drive, offering an engaging experience that appeals to enthusiasts. With its rich motorsport heritage, the Abarth 500 embodies the essence of fun and excitement on both the streets and the race track.

details

Alfa Romeo Junior

5 (1)
rate

The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.

details
Abarth 500 595 695
Alfa Romeo Junior
500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
Junior @ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
32600 - 39400 £
Price
25700 - 41600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
Battery Capacity
37.80 kWh
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
3
Doors
5
Curb weight
1410 - 1435 kg
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
Trunk capacity
185 L
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
Length
3673 mm
Length
4173 mm
Width
1682 mm
Width
1781 mm
Height
1518 mm
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
Max trunk capacity
550 L
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
Payload
370 - 385 kg
Payload
390 - 420 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
155 HP
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
Max Speed
155 km/h
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
114 kW
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1199 cm3

General

Model Year
2023
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
Brand
Abarth
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Is the Abarth 500 595 695 offered with different drivetrains?

The Abarth 500 595 695 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.