@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Abarth 500 595 695 vs Mazda CX-30 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Abarth 500 595 695 or Mazda CX-30 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Abarth 500 595 695 costs 32600 £. That’s a price difference of around 7328 £.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 31 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Abarth 500 595 695 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Abarth 500 595 695 tops out at 155 km/h. The difference is around 49 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-30 pulls slight stronger with 240 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers slightly more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Abarth 500 595 695 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1410 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 45 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers decisively more room – 430 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 245 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs significantly better – up to 1406 L, which is about 856 L more than the Abarth 500 595 695.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 distinct takes the win – 496 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 111 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Abarth 500 595 695

The Abarth 500, particularly in its 595 and 695 renditions, captures the spirit of Italian motoring with its compact yet aggressive design. Known for its lively performance and distinctive styling, this little powerhouse is a joy to drive, offering an engaging experience that appeals to enthusiasts. With its rich motorsport heritage, the Abarth 500 embodies the essence of fun and excitement on both the streets and the race track.

details
New Abarth 695 Competizione (4) @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
New Abarth 695 Competizione (2) @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
New Abarth 695 Competizione (3) @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
New Abarth 695 Competizione (14) @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
New Abarth 595 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
newabarthf595pack-62273022a7f13_6232f53f6a918 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
Abarth 500 595 695
Mazda CX-30
500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
32600 - 39400 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
37.80 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
3
Doors
5
Curb weight
1410 - 1435 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
185 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
3673 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1682 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1518 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
550 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
370 - 385 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
155 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
155 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
114 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Abarth
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Mokka
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Is the Abarth 500 595 695 offered with different drivetrains?

The Abarth 500 595 695 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.