@ Abarth / Stellantis Media
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Abarth 500 595 695 vs Mazda CX-80 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (155 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (32600 £ vs 48200 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Abarth 500 595 695 or Mazda CX-80?

Abarth 500 595 695

Mazda CX-80

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Abarth 500 595 695 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32600 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 15652 £.

As for range, the Abarth 500 595 695 performs decisively better – achieving up to 265 km, about 204 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a significantly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 172 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Abarth 500 595 695 takes 7 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs distinct better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Abarth 500 595 695 tops out at 155 km/h. The difference is around 64 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls convincingly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 315 Nm difference.

500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more seating capacity – 7 vs 4.

In curb weight, Abarth 500 595 695 is clearly lighter – 1410 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 721 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-80 offers noticeable more room – 258 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs clearly better – up to 1971 L, which is about 1421 L more than the Abarth 500 595 695.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 decisively takes the win – 650 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 265 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,200
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details
Abarth 500 595 695
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Abarth 500 595 695

The Abarth 500, particularly in its 595 and 695 renditions, captures the spirit of Italian motoring with its compact yet aggressive design. Known for its lively performance and distinctive styling, this little powerhouse is a joy to drive, offering an engaging experience that appeals to enthusiasts. With its rich motorsport heritage, the Abarth 500 embodies the essence of fun and excitement on both the streets and the race track.

details
New Abarth 695 Competizione (4) @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
New Abarth 695 Competizione (2) @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
New Abarth 695 Competizione (3) @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
New Abarth 695 Competizione (14) @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
New Abarth 595 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
newabarthf595pack-62273022a7f13_6232f53f6a918 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Reviews Abarth 500 595 695

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Abarth 500 595 695
Mazda CX-80
500 595 695 @ Abarth / Stellantis Media
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
32600 - 39400 £
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
Electric Range
61 km
Battery Capacity
37.80 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
7
Doors
3
Doors
5
Curb weight
1410 - 1435 kg
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity
185 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
3673 mm
Length
4995 mm
Width
1682 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1518 mm
Height
1714 mm
Max trunk capacity
550 L
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Payload
370 - 385 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
155 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
155 km/h
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
114 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Abarth
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda CR-V
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 present compelling options for those seeking a versatile SUV. The CR-V stands out with its robust reliability and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 offers a sportier driving experience with …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Discovery
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the Land Rover Discovery is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and Mitsubishi Outlander compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Is the Abarth 500 595 695 offered with different drivetrains?

The Abarth 500 595 695 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.