VS

Abarth 500 595 695 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (155 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (32,600 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Abarth 500 595 695 or Mazda CX-80?

Abarth 500 595 695 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Abarth 500 595 695

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

500 595 695

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Abarth 500 595 695 is clearly cheaper – starting at 32,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,766 £.

As for electric range, the Abarth 500 595 695 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 265 km, about 205 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 172 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Abarth 500 595 695 takes 7 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 315 Nm more.

500 595 695

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Abarth 500 595 695 is clearly lighter – 1,410 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 721 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-80 offers visibly more boot space – 258 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries significantly more – 650 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 265 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Abarth 500 595 695 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,600
500 595 695

Abarth 500 595 695

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 155 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.1 - 18.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 242 - 265 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Abarth 500 595 695
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Abarth 500 595 695

The Abarth 500, 595 and 695 pack feisty performance and a raucous exhaust character into a cheeky, compact package, blending sharp handling with bold Italian styling and unmistakable personality. They suit drivers who want a playful, driver-focused city car that stands out from the crowd and rewards enthusiastic cornering and personalization.

details
New Abarth 695 Competizione (4)
New Abarth 695 Competizione (2)
New Abarth 695 Competizione (3)
New Abarth 695 Competizione (14)
New Abarth 595
newabarthf595pack-62273022a7f13_6232f53f6a918

Reviews Abarth 500 595 695

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Tiziano
27 Jul 2026, 21:00:13

Fantastic car ❤️ Thrilling to drive!!!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Abarth 500 595 695
Fiat 500
VS
The Abarth 500 595 695 and Fiat 500 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Abarth 500 595 695
Fiat 500 Convertible
VS
Abarth 500 595 695 and Fiat 500 Convertible go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Abarth 500 595 695
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,600 - 38,600 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,410 - 1,435 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
185 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,682 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
370 - 385 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
155 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
114 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Abarth
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Abarth 500 595 695 have?

The Abarth 500 595 695 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.