Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Mazda CX-80 – Which one offers the better deal?
Two cars, one duel: Alfa Romeo Junior meets Mazda CX-80.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Junior
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alfa Romeo Junior has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25700 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 22543 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 4.80 L. The difference is about 3.20 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs significantly better – achieving up to 410 km, about 349 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
CX-80
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a somewhat edge – offering 327 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.90 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Alfa Romeo Junior tops out at 206 km/h. The difference is around 13 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm difference.
Junior
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers noticeable more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is convincingly lighter – 1380 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 751 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers evident more room – 415 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 157 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1971 L, which is about 691 L more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 noticeable takes the win – 650 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 230 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mazda CX-80 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £48,200
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
Alfa Romeo Junior
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
details
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Alfa Romeo Junior
Mazda CX-80
|
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25700 - 41600 £
|
Price
48200 - 60200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
61 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
35 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4995 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1714 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Mazda
|
What drive types are available for the Alfa Romeo Junior?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.