Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Mazda CX-80 comparison
Compare performance (280 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (26,100 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Mazda CX-80?
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Junior
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alfa Romeo Junior is clearly cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,228 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers considerably more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 350 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
CX-80
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Junior is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm more.
Junior
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is substantially lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 751 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers visibly more boot space – 415 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 157 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 230 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Alfa Romeo Junior holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £26,100
Alfa Romeo Junior
Alfa Romeo Junior
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alfa Romeo Junior
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
details
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,100 - 41,600 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,689 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,781 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
146 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.