What drive types are available for the Alpine A110?

The Alpine A110 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Alpine A110?

Depending on the version, the Alpine A110 delivers up to 345 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Alpine A110 in liters per 100 km?

On average, the Alpine A110 consumes 6.70 L.

What is the Alpine A110’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 96 L fit inside.

What are the Alpine A110’s length, width and height?

Length 4181 mm, width 1798 mm, height 1252 mm – those are the dimensions of the Alpine A110.

What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 1.60 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 61 km.

How fast can the Mazda CX-80 go?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches up to 219 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

How big is the Mazda CX-80 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 is 4995 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1714 mm high.

Alpine A110 vs Mazda CX-80 – Which model proves itself in everyday driving? Specs, differences & prices compared

A110 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Alpine A110 costs 55200 £. That’s a price difference of around 7028 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.70 L. The difference is about 5.10 L per 100 km.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 has a minimal edge – offering 345 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 3 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A110 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 285 km/h, while the Mazda CX-80 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 66 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 420 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm difference.

A110 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers significantly more seating capacity – 7 vs 2.

In curb weight, Alpine A110 is significantly lighter – 1150 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 981 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more room – 258 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 162 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 convincingly takes the win – 650 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 440 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Alpine A110

The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.

details