VS

Alpine A110 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (345 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A110 or Mazda CX-80?

Alpine A110 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Alpine A110

  • very slightly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A110

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is a bit cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Alpine A110 costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,914 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 offers very slightly more power – delivering 345 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 420 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.

A110

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A110 is substantially lighter – 1,150 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 981 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more boot space – 258 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 162 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 440 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Alpine A110
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A110

The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.

details
R-DAM_1367620
R-DAM_1367632 (1)
R-DAM_1367638
R-DAM_1367671
R-DAM_1367179

Reviews Alpine A110

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes GLB
VS
Mazda CX-80 and Mercedes GLB go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Alpine A110
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,200 - 282,900 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
152 - 157 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,150 - 1,194 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
96 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
166 - 210 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 345 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 4.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
185 - 254 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Alpine A110?

The Alpine A110 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.