VS

Alpine A110 vs Renault Arkana – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Alpine A110 meets Renault Arkana.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A110 @ media.renault.at

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Arkana has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Alpine A110 costs 55200 £. That’s a price difference of around 26785 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.70 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.

Arkana @ Renault

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 has a significantly edge – offering 345 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 202 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 7 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A110 performs evident better – reaching 285 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 113 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A110 pulls clearly stronger with 420 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 215 Nm difference.

A110 @ media.renault.at

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Arkana offers clearly more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.

In curb weight, Alpine A110 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1150 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 360 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers clearly more room – 480 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 384 L.

When it comes to payload, Renault Arkana decisively takes the win – 451 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 241 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Alpine A110 proves to be performs better in key areas and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Alpine A110 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £55,200
R-DAM_1367620

Alpine A110

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 252 - 345 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.7 - 6.9 L
details

Alpine A110

The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.

details
R-DAM_1367620 @ media.renault.at
R-DAM_1367632 (1) @ media.renault.at
R-DAM_1367638 @ media.renault.at
R-DAM_1367671 @ media.renault.at
R-DAM_1367179 @ media.renault.at

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p @ Renault
r210654p @ Renault
r210665p @ Renault
r210657p @ Renault
r210613p @ Renault
r210616p @ Renault

Similar Comparisons

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the latest showdown between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz, two distinct design philosophies come to the forefront. The Arkana impresses with its sporty coupe-SUV silhouette and practical versatility, making it perfect for urban drivers who crave style and functionality. Meanwhile, the Symbioz, as a bold vision of the future, showcases advanced autonomous technologies and an eco-friendly design, making it a fascinating glimpse into how Renault is shaping the sustainable automotive landscape.
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious interior, making it ideal for families. Ultimately, choosing between these two models comes down to personal style and practicality, providing consumers with impressive options from Renault's growing lineup.
Alpine A110
Renault Arkana
A110
Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
55200 - 282900 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 6.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
152 - 157 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
2
Doors
5
Curb weight
1150 - 1194 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
96 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4181 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1798 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1252 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
166 - 210 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 345 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 4.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
250 - 285 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 254 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1798 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana stands out with its sleek coupe-like design, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale offers a more traditional SUV layout, emphasizing practicality and spaciousness for families and adventure-seekers. Both models showcase Renault's commitment to innovation and efficiency, making them strong contenders in their segment.
Renault Arkana
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Arkana brings a sleek coupe-inspired design coupled with a robust performance, contrasting with the upcoming Dacia Bigster, which promises a rugged and spacious ride. The Arkana offers a more premium feel with its refined handling and advanced technology suite, whereas the Bigster is expected to attract adventure-seekers looking for practicality and an affordable price tag. As both models vie for attention, potential buyers will have to weigh Renault's stylish sophistication against Dacia's utilitarian charm.
Peugeot 3008
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover arena, the Peugeot 3008 and Renault Arkana each offer compelling features for the discerning driver. The Peugeot 3008 impresses with its chic interior and intuitive i-Cockpit design, delivering a sophisticated driving experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana combines stylish coupe-like aesthetics with robust practicality, making it a unique option for those seeking both flair and functionality.
Renault Arkana
VW T-Roc
VS
Citroen C4
Renault Arkana
VS
Alpine A110
Lotus Emira
VS
Hyundai Kona
Renault Arkana
VS
Audi Q2
Renault Arkana
VS
What drive types are available for the Alpine A110?

The Alpine A110 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.