Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A110 vs Renault Arkana comparison
Compare performance (345 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A110 or Renault Arkana?
Alpine A110 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A110
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana is considerably cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Alpine A110 costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,785 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 offers significantly more power – delivering 345 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 202 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A110 delivers significantly more torque with 420 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 215 Nm more.
A110
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Renault Arkana offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Alpine A110 is visibly lighter – 1,150 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 360 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries substantially more – 451 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 241 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Alpine A110 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £55,200
Alpine A110
Alpine A110
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alpine A110
The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.
details
Renault Arkana
The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.
details
Alpine A110
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
55,200 - 282,900 £
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
152 - 157 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Coupe
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
2
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,150 - 1,194 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
96 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,181 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,798 mm
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
|
Height
1,252 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
166 - 210 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 345 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 4.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
285 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
185 - 254 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.