Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Polestar 4 – Which car suits you better?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Polestar 4?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Alpine A290 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Polestar 4 costs 53100 £. That’s a price difference of around 19886 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Polestar 4 with 17.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh.
As for range, the Polestar 4 performs distinct better – achieving up to 620 km, about 240 km more than the Alpine A290.
4
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 4 has a significantly edge – offering 544 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 326 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 4 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Polestar 4 performs to a small extent better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 4 pulls significantly stronger with 686 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 386 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is decisively lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2230 kg. The difference is around 751 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Polestar 4 offers distinct more room – 526 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 200 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Polestar 4 performs distinct better – up to 1536 L, which is about 430 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 minimal takes the win – 471 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Polestar 4 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Polestar 4 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £53,100
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 4
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Polestar 4
The Polestar 4 embodies a seamless blend of cutting-edge technology and sophisticated design, establishing itself as a prominent contender in the modern electric vehicle market. Its elegant exterior lines are complemented by an interior that prioritises both luxury and sustainability, offering a serene driving experience. With its focus on innovation, the Polestar 4 continues to push the boundaries of performance, setting a new standard for what an electric car can achieve.
details
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Alpine A290
Polestar 4
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
53100 - 59900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
590 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
94 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2230 - 2355 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
526 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4840 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
2008 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1534 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1536 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
455 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Polestar
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.