Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Skoda Elroq – Which model is better for everyday use?
Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Skoda Elroq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Elroq has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 4114 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Elroq: with 15.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.60 kWh.
As for range, the Skoda Elroq performs distinct better – achieving up to 580 km, about 200 km more than the Alpine A290.
Elroq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq has a noticeable edge – offering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Elroq performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Elroq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1949 kg. The difference is around 470 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers distinct more room – 470 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 144 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq performs evident better – up to 1580 L, which is about 474 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Elroq slightly takes the win – 531 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Elroq proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Elroq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £29,100
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Skoda Elroq
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Alpine A290
Skoda Elroq
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
29100 - 45500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
377 - 580 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1949 - 2268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4488 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1884 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
470 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.