Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Skoda Elroq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 37900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Skoda Elroq?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alpine A290 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 37900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4697 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Elroq: with 15.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq performs distinct better – achieving up to 573 km, about 193 km more than the Alpine A290.
Elroq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq has a noticeable edge – offering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Elroq performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Elroq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1554 kg compared to 2133 kg. The difference is around 579 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers distinct more room – 470 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 144 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq performs evident better – up to 1580 L, which is about 474 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Elroq distinct takes the win – 517 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 121 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alpine A290
Skoda Elroq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £37,900
Skoda Elroq
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
Skoda Elroq
4.5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
Alpine A290
Skoda Elroq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
37900 - 45500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
529 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
77 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
2133 - 2268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4488 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1884 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
470 - 517 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.