VS

Alpine A290 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Toyota C-HR+?

Alpine A290 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • markedly more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Alpine A290 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 33,200 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,820 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the Alpine A290. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 227 km more than the Alpine A290.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers markedly more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 125 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota C-HR+ delivers somewhat more torque with 338 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is slightly lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 256 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR+ offers clearly more boot space – 416 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries visibly more – 655 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 259 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota bZ4X delivers serene electric driving, a spacious, tech-forward cabin and genuine zero-emissions appeal, while the Toyota C-HR+ packages Toyota’s clever hybrid economy into a sharper, more affordable crossover with punchy urban manners. Choose the bZ4X if you want EV range and futuristic …
Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Alpine A290
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In one corner: the Tesla Model Y — the electric SUV that turned long-range EVs and futuristic tech into everyday normal, complete with ludicrously quick acceleration and a touchscreen for everything. In the other: the Toyota C-HR+ — a sharply styled, clever little crossover that prefers fuel …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
Kia EV4 Hatchback
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The electric Kia EV4 Hatchback — slick, tech-packed and built for range-minded commutes — goes head-to-head with the quirky, style-first Toyota C‑HR+, a compact crossover that favours personality and frugal running costs. By the end of this DriveDuel showdown we’ll tell you which one deserves your …
VW ID.4
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the VW ID.4 and the Toyota C-HR+ sets an electric compact SUV against a fuel-efficient compact crossover, so your decision comes down to whether you want a pure-EV experience or practical economy and distinctive styling. This quick comparison highlights the ID.4’s electric range, charging …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.
Alpine A290
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
3,990 mm
Length
-
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
1,520 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,106 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Toyota
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.