VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Toyota C-HR+?

Skoda Enyaq vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • marginally cheaper
  • barely more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq VS Toyota C-HR+: quick take

Skoda Enyaq and Toyota C-HR+ sit at different points on the SUV map: one leans into roomy, calm practicality while the other trades interior volume for sharper efficiency and style. The Enyaq feels like a composed family cruiser that prioritises space, noise insulation and straightforward usefulness. The C-HR+ presents itself as a compact, efficiency‑focused crossover with clear urban strengths and a bolder design. This page walks through how those choices matter in everyday life rather than on a spec sheet.

C-HR+

Character and driving feel

The Skoda Enyaq drives like a calm, confident long‑distance companion — composed in a straight line, predictable through corners and never trying to be sporty. The Toyota C‑HR+ is more nimble around town and rewards careful inputs with a lighter, more engaging feel, but it can get vocally busy under strong acceleration. With Enyaq you get mass and mellow tuning that soaks up motorway miles; with C‑HR+ you get a livelier city personality that pays off in traffic and twisty roads, at the cost of some drivetrain noise. Choose based on whether you prefer serenity on motorways (Enyaq) or a brisk, efficient urban driver (C‑HR+).

Enyaq

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

On long runs the Skoda Enyaq is clearly focused on comfort — excellent noise insulation and chairs that invite relaxed hours behind the wheel make long days less tiring. The Toyota C‑HR+ is comfortable too, but it feels more compact and taut: good for cruising, yet less forgiving over repeated, sharp road imperfections and with a smaller rear cabin for tall passengers. Enyaq’s calmer ride and more spacious rear seats make it the smarter pick for regular family touring. If your weeks include lots of motorway miles with passengers and luggage, the Enyaq’s approach is purposefully more relaxing.

C-HR+

City friendliness and everyday usability

In tight urban environments the Toyota C‑HR+ excels: compact dimensions, light steering and a powertrain that often runs electrically make it a natural for stop‑start commuting and short trips. The Skoda Enyaq is still surprisingly manageable for its size, with good visibility and user‑friendly ergonomics, but its larger footprint and greater kerb weight make parking and rapid manoeuvres more of a consideration. Practical details also split them: the C‑HR+’s hybrid focus helps cut running costs around town, while the Enyaq’s pure‑electric range and charging behaviour matter more if you routinely do longer stretches between plugs. City buyers who prize manoeuvrability and economy will prefer the C‑HR+, whereas those who need occasional long trips from the same car will favour the Enyaq’s strengths.

Enyaq

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The Skoda Enyaq presents an understated, well‑built cabin that leans on sensible storage, neat materials and an airy sense of space — it reads more mature than flashy. The Toyota C‑HR+ places more emphasis on design punch and a tactile cockpit with physical climate controls that users praise for everyday convenience. Infotainment on the Enyaq can feel touch‑centric and sometimes slow, while the C‑HR+ offers a snappier interface and clearer physical buttons, which makes a difference in daily usability. Both cars feel more premium than their segments used to, but Enyaq trades flair for calm quality whereas C‑HR+ trades some space for sharper interior styling and ergonomics.

C-HR+

Practicality and buyer fit — who should choose which

If your priority is passenger comfort, luggage space and low‑stress long journeys, the Skoda Enyaq is the better fit: it’s aimed at families and frequent motorway users who value roomy practicality and a quiet cabin. If you live in the city, want lowest real‑world running costs for short commutes and prefer a compact, attention‑grabbing crossover, the Toyota C‑HR+ is the more logical choice despite its compromises in rear room and boot usability. Both cars make sensible, different compromises — Enyaq leans into comfort and cargo, C‑HR+ into efficiency and urban agility — and the detailed technical comparison that follows will show how those trade‑offs translate into range, weight and payload differences you’ll want to check against your typical use.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota C-HR+ is marginally cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is slightly more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 18 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers barely more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 341 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is moderately lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 169 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries slightly more – 655 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 129 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
details
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Big, bold and fully electric, the Ford Explorer EV aims to be the long‑range road trip hero, while the Toyota C‑HR+ packs quirky styling and city‑friendly agility into a compact crossover. Choose Explorer for space and presence, C‑HR+ for economy and personality — and yes, we’ll tell you which one …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.