Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Volvo EX40 – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Volvo EX40?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alpine A290 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Volvo EX40 costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 9677 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Volvo EX40 with 16.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.80 kWh.
As for range, the Volvo EX40 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 576 km, about 196 km more than the Alpine A290.
EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 has a decisively edge – offering 442 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 224 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Volvo EX40 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX40 pulls clearly stronger with 670 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is evident lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2040 kg. The difference is around 561 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo EX40 offers noticeable more room – 410 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 84 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX40 performs noticeable better – up to 1400 L, which is about 294 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Volvo EX40 barely noticeable takes the win – 480 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Volvo EX40 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £42,800
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Volvo EX40
The Volvo EX40 represents a new chapter in the brand's commitment to sustainability and innovation, combining elegant Scandinavian design with cutting-edge electric vehicle technology. With its spacious interior and intuitive technology, the EX40 provides a comfortable and connected driving experience. The focus on eco-friendly materials and efficient performance makes it an attractive choice for those seeking a responsible and stylish drive.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
Alpine A290
Volvo EX40
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
42800 - 58200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2040 - 2170 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4440 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1647 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1286 - 1400 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.