VS

Alpine A290 vs Volvo XC90 comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Volvo XC90?

Alpine A290 vs Volvo XC90: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • noticeably lighter
details

Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Alpine A290 is clearly cheaper – starting at 33,200 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 41,134 £.

As for electric range, the Alpine A290 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 380 km, about 311 km more than the Volvo XC90.

XC90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers considerably more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 188 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers clearly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 369 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeably lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 526 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries considerably more – 710 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 314 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A290 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,200
A290

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 364 - 380 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Peugeot 5008
Volvo XC90
VS
The Peugeot 5008 and Volvo XC90 both offer three-row seating but aim at different buyers: the 5008 is a practical, value-focused family SUV while the XC90 is a premium, safety-led luxury SUV. This comparison will focus on space, comfort, performance, efficiency and running costs to help you decide …
Alpine A290
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo XC90

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

details
294665_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294657_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294651_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
248324_XC90_Plug-In_Hybrid_Inscription_T8_-_Seat_Configuration
294870_XC90_Recharge_interior

Reviews Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Ffg
16 May 2026, 03:34:35

Ffggggggg ffg

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Borstel
11 Nov 2025, 12:59:12

I drive both cars. The XC90’s boot is — contrary to the figures posted here — noticeably larger than the GLC’s when carrying five people. Overall the XC90 is clearly the more comfortable and, above all, the more stable — and therefore the safer — car.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC90
Land Rover Defender
VS
The Volvo XC90 and the Land Rover Defender serve very different needs: the XC90 is a refined, safety-focused luxury family SUV with elegant styling and hybrid options, while the Defender is a purpose-built, go-anywhere vehicle that prioritises durability and off-road capability. Choosing between …
Volvo XC90
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC90 is the serene, safety-obsessed family flagship—roomy, plush and blessed with Volvo’s calm Scandinavian style and efficient hybrid options that make long hauls a pleasure. The VW Tayron, by contrast, is the scrappy value player: sharper to drive, loaded with slick tech for less money, …
Volvo XC90
MG MGS9
VS
The Volvo XC90 and the MG MGS9 are rival seven-seat SUVs aimed at buyers who want space, comfort and modern tech — but they come from very different traditions: Volvo leans on safety, refined materials and a premium driving feel, while MG focuses on affordability and generous equipment. This quick …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Volvo XC90
Volvo EX60
VS
Choosing between the Volvo XC90 and the Volvo EX60 comes down to whether you prioritize traditional SUV space and towing versatility or a modern, efficient electric driving experience. The XC90 is Volvo's roomy, three-row flagship with hybrid and plug-in options focused on comfort and utility, …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Volvo V90
Volvo XC90
VS
In comparing the Volvo V90 and the Volvo XC90, buyers will find distinct advantages tailored to different lifestyle needs. The V90, with its sleek wagon design and sophisticated handling, appeals to those who value a more traditional driving experience combined with generous cargo space. On the …
Alpine A290
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
69 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
71 - 188 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,923 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
600 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Volvo
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.