@ Audi AG
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Audi A4 Avant vs Mazda CX-30 – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A4 Avant or Mazda CX-30?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A4 Avant @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Audi A4 Avant costs 37200 £. That’s a price difference of around 12008 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi A4 Avant manages with 4.80 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A4 Avant has a convincingly edge – offering 470 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 284 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A4 Avant is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 4.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi A4 Avant performs noticeable better – reaching 300 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 96 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi A4 Avant pulls significantly stronger with 600 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm difference.

A4 Avant @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is barely noticeable lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1595 kg. The difference is around 140 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi A4 Avant offers slightly more room – 495 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Audi A4 Avant performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1495 L, which is about 89 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Audi A4 Avant a bit takes the win – 565 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi A4 Avant shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £37,200
A4 Avant @ Audi AG

Audi A4 Avant

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 136 - 470 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 9.7 L
details

Audi A4 Avant

The Audi A4 Avant blends elegant, understated styling with practical estate versatility, making it a polished choice for drivers who want both poise and generous cargo space. Inside, the cabin feels premium and tech-forward while the composed driving manners turn routine journeys into a quietly satisfying experience—exactly the sensible indulgence buyers will appreciate.

details
A198946_overfull @ Audi AG
A198948_overfull @ Audi AG
A198973_overfull @ Audi AG
A198950_overfull @ Audi AG
A198934_overfull @ Audi AG

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
Audi A4 Avant
Mazda CX-30
A4 Avant @ Audi AG
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
37200 - 122500 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 9.7 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 220 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1595 - 1820 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
495 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4750 - 4782 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1842 - 1866 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1428 - 1493 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1495 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
510 - 565 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 470 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
210 - 300 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
270 - 600 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
100 - 346 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1968 - 2894 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2023 - 2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage stands out with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology features, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 captivates drivers with its sporty handling and upscale interior, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Mokka
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drivetrain options does the Audi A4 Avant have?

The Audi A4 Avant is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.