Compare performance (186 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Skoda Karoq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the increasingly competitive SUV market, two contenders have caught our eye this year: the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Karoq. Both vehicles come with their own set of strengths, technical finesse, and innovations. If you're in the market for a compact SUV, here's how these two stack up.
The Mazda CX-30 measures 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height, giving it a sporty and robust appearance. Meanwhile, the Skoda Karoq is slightly shorter and wider at a length of approximately 4390 mm, a width of 1841 mm, and heights ranging from 1603 mm to 1624 mm, exuding a more rugged yet refined look. Both models feature five doors and emphasize utility and versatility.
The Mazda CX-30 offers two petrol mild-hybrid engine options, delivering power outputs of 137 kW (186 HP) and 103 kW (140 HP). It is available in both manual and automatic transmissions, with a maximum speed ranging from 191 km/h to 204 km/h. Impressively, the CX-30 offers an average acceleration time from 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 8.3 seconds.
On the other hand, the Skoda Karoq caters to diverse preferences with petrol and diesel engines. It offers power options ranging from 85 kW (115 HP) to 140 kW (190 HP) and likewise provides manual and dual-clutch automatic transmission options. The Karoq’s strongest engine allows it to reach up to 221 km/h, with the quickest 0 to 100 km/h acceleration time being 7 seconds.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Mazda CX-30 offers a fuel consumption ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km. As for CO2 emissions, the values hover between 129 to 148 g/km, categorizing it in efficiency classes D and E.
For Skoda Karoq, the fuel consumption varies between 4.9 to 7.6 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions spanning from 129 to 174 g/km, covering efficiency classes D, E, and F. The Karoq edges out in terms of broader fuel choices, including a diesel option.
The Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a trunk capacity ranging from 422 to 430 liters, suitable for everyday needs and small road trips. With a 51 to 48-liter fuel tank, it balances ride range with efficiency. Meanwhile, the Skoda Karoq offers a more substantial trunk capacity at 521 liters, eclipsing the CX-30, and boasts a fuel tank capacity of up to 55 liters.
Both models boast cutting-edge technology features, but they tailor to different preferences. Mazda leans into its rich driving experience with a focus on the Jinba Ittai philosophy, aiming to create a seamless connection between car and driver. The CX-30 is also equipped with Mazda's i-Activsense suite of safety features.
Conversely, the Skoda Karoq prioritizes practicality with 'Simply Clever' solutions, like adjustable rear seats and advanced connectivity options, including Skoda Connect, which offers state-of-the-art infotainment services and remote access features.
Choosing between the Mazda CX-30 and Skoda Karoq boils down to personal preference. If you value driving dynamics and a sporty feel, the CX-30 is an excellent choice. However, if practicality, versatility, and an array of powertrains are what you seek, the Karoq offers a compelling package.
Both these SUVs show the best of what 2024 has to offer, making either a commendable choice in the crowded SUV market.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-30 is moderately cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Skoda Karoq costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,848 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Karoq uses 4.9 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq offers marginally more power – delivering 190 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 4 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Karoq delivers markedly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Karoq is barely lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers a bit more boot space – 521 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries marginally more – 549 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
The Skoda Karoq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
Skoda Karoq is a smartly packaged compact SUV that balances practical family-friendly space with composed handling, making daily drives feel easy and assured. Its straightforward design, roomy cabin with clever storage solutions, and sensible equipment make it a strong choice for buyers seeking value and versatility without fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,841 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España