Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi A5 Sportback vs Mazda CX-60 – Which model is better for everyday use?
A5 Sportback
@ Audi AG
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi A5 Sportback has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38700 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 3163 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Audi A5 Sportback with 2 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Audi A5 Sportback performs convincingly better – achieving up to 110 km, about 46 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A5 Sportback has a somewhat edge – offering 367 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A5 Sportback is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi A5 Sportback performs somewhat better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 550 Nm.
A5 Sportback
@ Audi AG
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers somewhat more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Audi A5 Sportback is barely noticeable lighter – 1770 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 120 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers evident more room – 570 L compared to 445 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs evident better – up to 1726 L, which is about 427 L more than the Audi A5 Sportback.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 somewhat takes the win – 612 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 82 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mazda CX-60 proves to be offers a more balanced package and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
Audi A5 Sportback
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £41,900
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
Audi A5 Sportback
The Audi A5 Sportback dresses up sleek coupe proportions with the everyday sense of a practical hatchback, so you get striking looks without the compromises. Behind the wheel it balances poise and comfort with premium trimmings that make daily driving feel a little bit special — ideal for buyers who want style and substance in equal measure.
details
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
Mazda CX-60
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Audi A5 Sportback
Mazda CX-60
|
@ Audi AG
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38700 - 68600 £
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 7.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
107 - 110 km
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
20.70 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
45 - 172 g/km
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
46 - 60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1770 - 2170 kg
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
331 - 445 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
4829 - 4835 mm
|
Length
4745 mm
|
|
Width
1860 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1429 - 1444 mm
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1175 - 1299 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
|
Payload
475 - 530 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 367 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
216 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
280 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
110 - 270 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1968 - 2995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Is the Audi A5 Sportback offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.